Top 10 Reasons Why Girls Don’t Want a Nice Guy

Girls Don’t Want a Nice Guy

Through extensive interviews and research, (no, not just my cousins this time) I have compiled a list of the top 10 reason why girls don’t like nice guys. Oh they say they want a nice guy, but at the end of the day, they don’t date nice guys. I know it’s a double standard, that girls need to appear to be respectable, i.e. not a sleezy slut, so they try and be seen with a decent guy, but they crave bad boys. All those guys in jail prove it. They all have or had girl friends. So the message is clear, broken English; high-school drop out; police record; getting into fights, is a sure way to get in bed with 99.999999% of the girls on the planet.

Bad Boy and Bad Girl

What’s worse is, the very thing that women crave, they look for in a man with the opposite qualities. And, what are these qualities that women want? Oh that’s easy:

• strength
• protection
• freedom

They are under the assumption that they cannot get these qualities in a nice guy, so they go looking for it in a bad boy.

Top 10 Reasons Why Nice Guys Finish Last

1. Nice guys have no adventure or are not wild and crazy: women are constantly thinking that good guys are boring and have absolutely no fun.  Apparently good guys stay home and read books (or write blogs, wait a minute, that’s me *gasp*).  Girls don’t think good guys have any “fun”, like getting arrested?
2. Nice guys have no sense of humor: turn on any t.v. show and you’ll find some idiot guy punching, kicking, tripping or falling, and laughing about it.  Even videos online have guys getting into fights and laughing about it.  If you’re a guy in a public computer place, your best bet to get a chick is to watch one of those videos and laugh at it and ask a cute girl to come watch it with you.  9 out of 10 of those girls will give you their number on the spot.
3. Nice guys cry.  Girls think that being sensitive in a man is a sign of complete weakness.  It’s an extremely unfair double standard.  They want a guy to ask them what’s wrong with them when they’re sad, but God forbid he ever has a bad day.  You can’t have a guy that is sensitive enough to see when you’re sad, yet not feel sad himself.  He either is sensitive or he’s not.  He either knows when you’re crying, because he cries too, or he doesn’t give a rat’s patoot at all.
4. Nice guys run away from fights.  However dumb that even sounds, girls think that bad boys will stick up for them [the girl] and for themselves.  What women have no understanding is that intimidation is how most fights are actually won.  Guys don’t lift weights to be better fighters, we lift weights so we can be physically menacing.  How many men in the U.S. are actually on a professional football team?  That would be about 0.00000001% of the male population.  Yet the fitness industry has exploded.  There are more physically fit and bodybuilder level men now that ever in the history of mankind.  And, it’s not because men need to be that big.
5. Nice guys don’t drink / smoke.  This may vary around the country.  Around here there is a huge section of the population that is from a cult, and they don’t drink or smoke.  No girl wants to date them, except the other cult girls, but … anywho.  Girls feel they cannot go “out” with nice guys and have a little night on the town.  Trust me, going to the library, as a date, is no fun.  I’ve done it.  LOL  She asked me to meet her there so, don’t blame me.
6. Nice guys are not confident.  This is one of the biggest complaints girls have about nice guys.  While noone wants to be physically abused, a lot of women want to be manhandled.  They want to physically feel the strength of the guy on their body.  This is why so many women are attracted to big body builder guys.  Even fat guys are more successful than skinny guys.  Being physically imposing, goes a long way with women.  Although the good guy would say he’s being polite, most women have absolutely no concept of manners.  At least, in this day and age they do not.  Girls have no idea that saying “excuse me” is actually polite.  Therefore they are attracted to a guy that simply brushes by them, more than a guy that waits until you get out of the way, or says excuse me as he walks by.
7. Nice guys don’t make “moves”.  While this is a huge oxymoron, it made the list.  This is just to show you how stupid [no offense] these girls are.  You see, they’re talking out of both sides of their mouth.  On the one hand they say that good guys don’t make moves on them, but at the end of the day, neither do bad boys.  In both cases the girl makes the first move and makes all the moves thereafter.  You see the bad boy ignores the girl, which turns her on.  So either they want to be ignored or they don’t want to be ignored.  They complain that the good guy is too shy and doesn’t make a move, but then the bad boy doesn’t make a move either.
8. Nice guys don’t have money.  This right here … sigh.  So the story is that bad boys, who probably just got through mugging someone, give the girls money occasionally and nice guys don’t.  Oh the nice guy pays for a meal, but he doesn’t hand over wads of cash.  Even if they girl knows where the bad boy got the money, they don’t care.  As long as they hand them the money, they don’t care.  They also think that bad boys have more potential to be rich some day, probably from watching how evil bastards do get rich in business.
9. Nice  guys are creepy or stalk you.  Although, this is by definition, not a good guy, this made the list.  Girls think that being nice is so strange that it is creepy.  A guy that smiles at you, laughs at your jokes, buys you a drink, is somehow interpreted as creepy.  I chalk this up to girls just be schizo and not knowing what they want.
10. Nice guys don’t know how to have sex.  I didn’t go into details, but, apparently being a good guy automatically means that you do missionary and immediately fall asleep.  Many, many girls said they want a bad boy in bed.  They tended to shy away from good guys on this very fact.  Even if they truly wanted a nice guy, they turned him down because at the back of their mind, nice guys cannot handle the bedroom.  [buncha whores if you ask me, JUST KIDDING]

Solution for Nice Guys

Don’t Stop Being a Nice Guy

Well after that list, what can a nice guy do?  It is my learned opinion, after viewing this entire list and going through all of the copious information I gathered for this scholarly article, that only one conclusion can be drawn from it:

NICE GUYS SHOULD ONLY DATE NICE GIRLS

And, there you have it.  It is a peculiar type of woman that craves for a bad boy.  I observed that only bad girls, in some form, want bad boys.  They spoke of how they wanted some guy to be “open minded”.  This means to me that they themselves are lacking and therefore, they need someone who can deal with their lack.  People say that women are emotional.  Well, after asking this question and looking hundreds of girls right in the eye, I can safely say that, girls a schizoid freaks.  I don’t think emotional quite captures it. [totally being sarcastic]

This was fun to do.

 Please visit my legal website: Nevada DUI Attorneys
See me on YouTube: Seattle Cop Punches Black Teenage Girl

You’re Not Playing Hard to Get You’re playing Hard to Notice

Playing Hard to Get … Noticed

So many girls are simply not taught by their mothers correctly of what the situation is in the dating scene.  Even worse, the father doesn’t even mention dating to his little girl.  Sure some fathers go the opposite side of the road and try and scare the bejeezus out of the girl, telling her all sorts of horrific tales of how evil men are, but those aren’t as common as those fathers who simply shut up and never mention anything.  In their efforts to keep their little girl from being hurt, battered, bruised or left alone, they end up leaving them to fend for themselves.  I mean, we’re here to populate the planet.  We cannot do that by burying our heads in the sand and pretending the opposite sex doesn’t exist.  So, we end up with a daughter that sits in a bar scared to death of some inevitable horror that will play out in her love life.  The end result is that she is miserable and whoever she “dates” is equally miserable.  Don’t even get me started on those who got absolutely no heads up by their parents on dating, and thus went to MTV for their advice on how dating should be done.  Hello, Tila Tequila. [I followed her on twitter for about a month.  I just couldn’t take how vile she is, and unfollowed her like a bad habit. But, you didn’t hear that from me, cuz I ain’t one to gossip.]

She’s Playing Hard to Get

Speaking of pathetic, and the entire reason for this article, I see this tragedy play out all the time.  Girl sits at the bar, blending in with the upholstery, sighing.  Noone talks to her all night, and proceeds to go home and tell her pillow how there are “no good men left in the world.”  She has a sense that she shouldn’t be a total skank, so she tries to play “hard to get”.  The problem is, she’s not playing hard to get, she’s playing hard to notice.

Let’s be honest for a second.  For all the women out there that only attract loser boyfriends, look in the mirror honey, you’re a loser.  Like attracts like.  With that said, being afraid of attracting some horrible guy is not something that just happens by chance.  Sitting at a bar, hoping not to attract the “wrong” guy should not be your focus.  You should doll yourself up, lose the weight and be confident that the “right” guy will be attracted to you.

You have no idea how many friend girls I hear complain about how they never meet anyone.  I don’t have the heart to tell them, it’s them and not the guys.  I have no idea who would be attracted to hair that has never seen conditioner, a roller nor a highlight.  I have had grown women tell me there is no need for them to look attractive.  Really?  [Sigh]

Don’t get me wrong, I’m not here to push the beauty industry down your throat but christ almighty, ashy legs and broken straps are not something people need to see.  No, don’t go buy the entire stock of the make-up counter at Neiman Marcus, but don’t look like a homeless bum either.

Some girls and women need to stop being delusional that they are playing hard to get and realize they are playing hard to notice.

Please visit my legal website: Nevada DUI Attorneys
See me on YouTube: Seattle Cop Punches Black Teenage Girl

Time is Not Money, Money is Time

Money is Time

Benjamin Franklin

Benjamin Franklin said “Time is Money”.  While I am sure mister Franklin meant well, and for most even conceiving of money and time in an exchange relationship, was a revelation they probably had never thought of, it is time to put the quote to rights.  Time is not money.  Or, let me clarify.  If the object of your life is to live a content life and make enough money to do so, time is money is not for you.  If you wish to live a subservient life and have a lifestyle dependent upon the whims of someone else, then time is money is your bread and butter, life philosophy.  It is patently obvious that those who have no concept of the real relationship of time and money are doomed and destined to live a life of servitude.  But, once you wrap your head around the idea that money and time are somehow related, you will immediately come to the realization that money is time and not the reverse.  You can buy time, and conversely, you can buy money.

What does it mean that time is money?  Well for the lower class, they trade their time for money.  They measure their wealthy by the number of hours they can work for someone else to pay them.  Understand the pure and simple, complete, all-encompassing definition of that phrase.  Anyone that trades their time for money is in that category: a fast-food worker; a mechanic; a lawyer; a doctor.  Because once they are done with their task and are paid, they have to put in more time to generate more money.  They cannot go back and get more money for those same house that they worked.  They cannot double, triple nor even gain 10% more money from that lost time.  They have to change their wealth building model to generate more wealth in the same frame of time.  They have to come to the realization that money is time.

What is money is time?  What is this wealth building concept?  It is quite easy to understand on an extremely large scale.  The concept is also simple, as was time is money.  And, it is this:

you generate wealth by making a set of decisions that set things in motion that continually increase or generate money for you.

For instance, if you purchase a business and someone else runs it for you, you have made a decision that sets in motion something that generates money for you.  If you were to purchase a rental property and rented it out to someone, you have made a decision that set in motion something that generates money for you.  If you were to hire someone to work for you that generates money, you have made a decision that set in motion something that generates money for you.

You are no longer trading time for money, you are now trading money for time, i.e. time for you to do either other things to make more money, or time for you to blow off.  You are spending money to generate …  [drum roll please ] AN ASSET.

Most Americans have no concept of what an asset is.  By definition an asset generates money by you doing absolutely nothing more than owning it.  You can put forth effort for that same asset to generate even more money, however it does not change the status of the asset’s ability to generate money by itself.

Many charlatans confuse Americans into thinking that their personal home is an asset because, due to the devaluation of the dollar, their property can be sold for more money at a later date, than what they paid for it.  If those same Americans were to sit down at their kitchen table with stats showing the dollar devaluation, inflation charts, amortization charts and factor in all expenses, including taxes, they would immediately see that they are not making any money on their homes, and it is not an asset.  Sadly, for someone else, their home is an asset, but not for the home-owner.

Please visit my legal website: Nevada DUI Attorneys
See me on YouTube: Seattle Cope Punches Black Teenage Girl

Palms Owner Gets Court Date For His DUI

Palms Casino Owner George Maloof Jr. Gets Trial Date For DUI

George Maloof Jr.

by Jagajeet Chiba, Gambling911.com – Las Vegas casino magnate and Sacramento Kings co-owner George Maloof Jr. has a trial date for his DUI case.  Maloof Jr. is the owner of the Palms Casino.  On October 9 [2010] he was pulled over on suspicion of driving while under the influence just southwest of the Las Vegas Strip.

Maloof later told The Associated Press that he had four beers at a wedding and that his blood-alcohol level was measured at 0.086%.

That’s just over the legal limit in Nevada of 0.08%, but Maloof said he thought he was “nowhere near intoxicated.”

Maloof’s attorney Wade Rabenhorst stood before the judge this past week in his client’s absence.

A May 31 trial date has been set.

Please visit my legal website: Nevada DUI Attorneys
See me on YouTube: Seattle Cop Punches Black Teenage Girl

Palm Casino Owner Arrested for DUI

Palms Owner George Maloof Arrested for DUI

George Maloof Jr.

by The Associated Press [LAS VEGAS]  — Palms Casino Resort owner George Maloof Jr. was arrested for drunken driving after being pulled over by police late Saturday night [October 9th, 2010].

George Maloof Jr. was arrested about 11:30 p.m. Saturday near Spanish Trail Country Club, where he lives, police said Monday. Maloof, 46, told The Associated Press he was driving home with his assistant from a friend’s wedding at The Mirage hotel-casino about six miles away.

Maloof said the assistant asked him to drive. “I just didn’t think I needed her to drive — I should have had her drive — because I didn’t drink that much,” said Maloof. He said he thought he was “nowhere near intoxicated” and would likely fight the arrest in court.

Maloof said he had four beers and his blood-alcohol level was measured at 0.086 percent. That’s just over the legal limit in Nevada of 0.08 percent. He said he asked if he could go home but was told he would be arrested.

Police searched his car and his assistant’s purse but found nothing else out of the ordinary, Maloof said. Police spokeswoman Barbara Morgan said Maloof was speeding 21 to 30 mph over the limit, made an illegal left turn and was driving without a valid license or proof of insurance.

Maloof said he didn’t post bail and didn’t want to call anyone, and was released from jail Sunday morning.

Maloof owns the resort with his brothers and sister. His family also owns the NBA’s Sacramento Kings.

Please visit my legal website: Nevada DUI Attorneys
See me on YouTube: Seattle Cop Punches Black Teenage Girl

Nevada Supreme Court Doesn’t Know Jack nor Pot

Nevada High Court Rejects Pot User’s Driving Bid

Nevada “High” Court

RGJ.com By Martha Bellisle – A California woman who legally smoked marijuana in her home state and then drove across the Nevada state line with an “inactive” marijuana metabolite in her system still is guilty under the state’s impaired driving law, the Nevada Supreme Court ruled.

Shira Garfinkel was convicted in Incline Justice Court of being over the legal limit of marijuana metabolite, which is the “inactive” substance the body produces to get ride of marijuana’s active ingredient tetrahydrocannabinol, or THC.

Her lawyer, Deputy Public Defender Priscilla Nielson appealed, arguing that since the metabolite is an “inactive” substance, it “does not affect the person’s ability to drive,” and the law is unconstitutional.

Justices Nancy Saitta, Michael Cherry and Mark Gibbons disagreed.

In an unpublished decision, which means the ruling only applies to this case and does not set legal precedence, the justices said they already ruled in another case that the law appropriately applies to both marijuana’s active ingredient and the metabolite, and they don’t need to “revisit that decision.”

They also dismissed Garfinkel’s claims that the law “interferes with her right to travel” because she is a legal user of marijuana in California and Nevada’s DUI law would keep her from crossing the state line.

The law does not prohibit her from traveling, the justices said, “it criminalizes her driving a motor vehicle through the state with prohibited substances in her blood and urine.”

Nielson said she was “somewhat discouraged” with the ruling and that she has not yet decided if she’ll ask the full court to review the case.

“I’m disappointed that they did not apply a legal analysis, they just looked at the bottom line of the Williams case,” Nielson said.

Case details

Jessica Williams was convicted in 2002 of running over and killing six teenagers after smoking marijuana.

She appealed, and the high court affirmed her conviction, saying the law served two legitimate state interests: promoting highway safety and deterring the illicit use of drugs, Nielson said.

Nielson said that neither of those points apply in this case. The metabolite does not impact driving ability because it’s inactive, and the drug use in this case was legal, she said.

According to William Anderson, chief toxicologist at the Washoe County crime lab, regular users of marijuana would have an almost continual level of metabolite in their systems.

Garfinkel was stopped for speeding on Tahoe Boulevard early in 2010 and charged with driving with a prohibited amount of a prohibited substance. She has a doctor-approved cannabis card that allows her to use the drug, under California law.

The courts

At her trial in Incline Village Justice Court, Judge Alan Tiras said she was not guilty of having THC in her system. Her test showed she had two nanograms of the THC, the legal limit.

But since the test is plus-or-minus 1 nanogram, he did not convict her. But he found her guilty of having the metabolite in her system. The test measured 20 nanograms of metabolite, and the legal limit is 5 nanograms.

She appealed to Washoe District Court, and Judge Robert Perry affirmed Tiras’ ruling.

The next appeal took her argument to the Supreme Court, but the justices affirmed the conviction.

“Garfinkel’s attempts to distinguish her case from Williams by arguing that in Williams this court grappled only with the prohibition on active marijuana and did not meaningfully analyze the constitutional implications of the prohibition of driving while carrying marijuana metabolite in the blood are unavailing,” the ruling said.

In the Williams decision, the justices said, they “rejected the arguments of those who claimed that the law ‘lacked a direct correlation between the prohibited drugs in a driver’s system and impairment.'”

---

Conclusion

In this case clearly the justices did not even look at the law, nor he facts of the case.  The intent of the law is to stop someone who is impaired from driving a very heavy, speeding vehicle that will do serious harm to someone else.  In this case, there was no evidence of any potential harm coming to anyone since the substance in question was not the marijuana, but the bodies production of a substance which cleans out marijuana.  It is like saying having bleach or bathroom cleaner is evidence there was illegal substances in your bathroom and therefore you’re criminally liable.

Now, I don’t mean to cast aspersions on a fine Nevada DUI Attorney, but how do you lose a case on these facts?  Yes, the DUI attorney was looking for the court to declare the law unconstitutional, but it seems nearly a slam dunk.  That last sentence makes assumption of the reader.  I apologize and will correct that assumption now.  The DUI attorney was looking for the Nevada Supreme Court to declare the law unconstitutional.  It is my personal opinion that all courts and police are completely corrupt and run amuck of the constitution ad nauseum.  There is almost no way that any court in the land would declare any law unconstitutional these days, UNLESS, it was so blatantly obvious that even the ignorant, unwashed masses could plainly see it was unconstitutional.  It is the same reasoning we have a 2 billion dollar HIV industry.  They haven’t located actual HIV, but they can see antibodies to HIV.  This is the same reasoning.  There was no THC, the substance in marijuana that makes you high, but they found metabolite in her system, nor was she potentially dangerous while driving.

Please visit my legal website: Nevada DUI Attorneys
See me on YouTube: Seattle Cop Punches Black Teenage Girl

10 Things That Proves She’s Not Into You

She’s Just Not That Into You

While researching this topic, I perused many cute and anecdotal quips about modern relationships with women.  None of them had anything to do with the modern woman and how, through bad parenting, a complete lack of social skills, no finishing schools to speak of, women have degraded to the point where you have to weed out the scrubs.  If you’re chasing some woman and find it hard to get a date with her, you might want to step back and review who exactly you’re trying to chase.  I have come up with 10 things to prove she’s not into you.  But, my list also prove she might actually be on the down low to begin with and is just trying to play a role to the public so noone gets suspicious.  Let’s face it, being a lesbian is not accepted by everyone, regardless of what you see on MTV or t.v. in general.  The reality is, homosexuality is not a universally accepted way of life, in the real world.  Yes, I know it must hurt some people’s feelings for someone to say that out loud, but we’re all adults here, or should be.  I write some pretty boring crap.  I hope no child would read this material.  In other words, you could be barking up the wrong tree altogether and don’t even know it.  Then, when you fail to get the girl, you beat yourself up, thinking you did something wrong.

This is the general consensus of the “… is just not into you,” lists that are floating around.  They all say, somehow it is your fault the other person isn’t into you.  Trust me when I say, anyone, can get anyone, given the right time and opportunity.  You could be smelly, old, young, fat, ugly and speak bad English, and still land a super model.  I’ve seen it.  I’ve arranged it.  Nuff said!

She’s Just Not That Into You List

She’s Just Not That Into You

10. When introduced, she failed to mention her name – this should be a huge warning sign.  Also this should prove to you that, this person has a lot to hide.  It is not enough that fake women give fake names and fake numbers, but if a woman doesn’t mention her name at all, that’s a whole other ball of wax.  Unless she’s working for the CIA and is deep deep deep undercover, she should give you her name when you are politely shaking her hand and telling her yours.

9.  She leaves without saying goodbye or nice to meet you – this is classic douchebag mentality.  Having no home training isn’t cute, but it could be a warning sign that she is ducking out, and not simply forgetting to be polite.  It would be one thing to be in a long term relationship and be overbearing and need to know where she is all the time.  But, if you just met her and she’s ducking out, that’s a sign to forget all about her.  At best she has no manners.  At worst, she intentionally did it.  For every douchebag female you meet, there are two sweet and polite ones just wishing to meet you.

8. She refuses any and all drink offers from you – this shows that she is most likely paranoid, and you don’t need that sort of baggage.  If any girl refuses a drink from you, in general, you should just move on at that point, regardless of how long you’ve been talking to her.  At the very least she’s telling you that she is not interested in a relationship with you and at the worst, she’s a paranoid schizophrenic and might be an axe murderer.  Run!  If you are sitting with friends and buying them drinks and she refuses, you might want to ask her to leave, or get your friends to move to another spot with you.

7. She accepts drinks from you, but says nothing to you – really?  Are you that dumb?  GTFO.  If you buy even one drink for her, or even give her a piece of gum and she doesn’t at least pretend to laugh at your corny jokes, it’s time for you to get away from her.

6. You just met her and she asks you for something – really?  In this day and age of women’s “lib”, no woman should ask a man for anything she cannot get by her self.  If you just meet her and she’s asking for something, she’s a moocher.  If she asks, even for a drink, at a bar, run don’t walk, away from her.  She’s a user.  Or worse, she thinks she can use you.

5. She always shows up with a friend – it doesn’t matter if it’s a guy or a girl, a permanent friend, means she needs a chaperon when she’s around you.  This does not send off warning signs, per se, but it could mean something a bit deeper.  If she shows up with the same friend all the time, it could mean that “friend” is hers and not just a friend.  You have to read the warning signs carefully.  Stop listening to what people say, “oh she’s just a girl friend.”  See what is going on in front of you.  She is a “girlfriend”.

4. Noone ever knows where she is – it might not just be you she doesn’t call or hang out with, her own friends might not have a clue what is going on with her.  This happens a lot.  The friends could be a warning sign that she’s unwelcome.  She might not ever be around because her own “friends” do not want her to be.  They might simply be pretending that they don’t know where she is, when the truth is that, they never call her.  Or, they could know she hangs out with her “friend” and know not to call her, nor speak about it.  Again, this is one of those, pay attention to what is going on around you.

3.  She looks like a 13 year old boy – this might be just too obvious, but I think some guys do not know.  You cannot know what you don’t know.  If the girl has a high and tight, wears plaid, and boots are all steel toes, this should be a huge warning sign to you.  She seriously, not into to you… Hell, she’s not into you nor your “kind”, and, never will be.  My only regret is that my lesbian friends cannot refurbish an engine.  I really got the short end of the stick.  No benefit anywhere 😦  [yup i got jokes]

2. She tells you, that she’s a lesbian – again this might seem obvious to most people, but there are guys out there that think this is an actual pickup line.  Let’s explore where this confusion comes from.  My lesbian representative informed me that girl on girl “movies” are not actual “women’s” “movies”, but the sick and twisted fantasies of some poor schlep who had the good fortune to be able to produce his own fantasy on-screen.  So let’s fast forward to #2.  The girl tells the guy she’s a lesbian and he reverts back to this “movie” that he saw with girl on girl action.  He then interprets it to mean his new found lesbian is in fact a fantasy girl and girl representative, in the flesh, come to show him a wild night out.  Now #2 doesn’t seem so far fetched anymore, when I explain it.  Some people are just that confused.

1. She threatens you with bodily harm – this should be the number 1 sign that a girl is just not that into you.

Remember, all that glitters is not gold.  Yes some girls play hard to get.  Some girls play games with guys, just to test them.  To that, I say leave them in the dust.  If a girl feels she has to test you, then you should ditch her as soon as possible.  Why?  Because she’s drama.  You do not need drama.  There is someone better looking, richer, can cook and drama free and is just waiting for you to come along.  Drop the elementary school chick and get with a real lady.

Please visit my legal website: Nevada DUI Attorneys
See me on YouTube: Seattle Cop Punches Black Teenage Girl

I’m Just Sayin: Chicks Can’t Wield Two Handed Swords

Female Heroes in Movies Are Dumb

Man with Zweihander

Don’t call me a woman hater or something stupid like that, but when I sit down to watch a period piece, i.e. movie set in a specific date in history, and the hero of the story is a woman, I know it is time to walk out of the movie.  Am I against women?  No!  I kinda prefer women; wink wink; nudge nudge.  But, having a woman jump thirty feet, kick ten guys, while punching five others and then body slamming two, is a bit much for my whole “reality-embedded” brain to handle.  Don’t get me wrong.  I am all for equal pay for women.  I am all for sharing of household responsibilities.  But, I am not going to divest my brain of all sanity and reason for 90 minutes just for the off chance, some obscure lesbian somewhere will get a kick out of watching a brainless bimbo do super heroic feats of strength by taking down 20 men twice her size and weight, in a single punch.  That might be great for that chick, but don’t expect me to buy into it.

What’s worse is, what message does this send to idiot chicks who think this is reality.  And, if you think I am joking around, let me tell you a story.

A chick came to my apartment once, when I was living with two other guys, and she proceeded to manhandle my roommate.  My roommate, being Latino, felt it his duty to allow her to thrash, not only, him, but our entire living room.  She proceeded to body slam him into shelves, desks, books and the t.v.  Well, I being the Capricorn and believer in equality that I am, grabbed her with 2 fingers, by the scruff of her neck and literally tossed her out of our apartment.  I then grabbed the two 90 lb guys that came in with her and told all of them, that they would never set foot in the apartment, as long as I lived there, ever again.  I think closed and locked the front door; told my roommates to clean up the front room; and went to bed.  I forgot to mention, I was completely naked except for a blanket I was holding around me with one hand, so this all took place with me doing this one-handed.

So let’s get back to these movies.  The person watching a movie is expected to identify with the hero of a story, somehow.  When it is a man, male viewers put themselves in the place of the hero, and women put themselves in the place of the damsel in distress.  When it is a female… noone identifies with her.  To this day, men still want to be heroes and women still want their knight in shining armor to come save them.

The reality is chicks cannot wield two handed swords.  Let’s take a look at a two handed sword.  The epitome of two handed swords, at least in Europe was that Zweihänder.  It weighed up to 16lbs and was up to 6 feet in length.

Guards could be plain or ornate, while hilts usually ended with heart or pear shaped heavy pommels. Occasionally a blunted portion of the forte, the ricasso or Fehlschärfe (meaning “missing sharpness”) at the base of the blade allowed a hand to be placed below the lower guard to “shorten the grip” and make the handle like a polearm. This allowed the user to crudely repel a cavalry charge. The swords have hilt-mounted side-rings and enlarged cross-guards of up to 35 cm (14 in) across. Along the blade, some 10–20 cm (4–8 in) from the upper guard, Parierhaken (“parrying hooks”) shaped like lugs or flanges acted as a guard for the ricasso to prevent other weapons from sliding down the blade. – wikipedia

Let’s see how a real man used the two handed sword:

Perhaps the best known user of a Zweihänder was Pier Gerlofs Donia who is reputed to have wielded it with such skill, strength and efficiency that he managed to behead multiple people with it in a single blow. The Zweihänder ascribed to him is, as of 2008, on display in the Frisian museum. It has a length of 213 cm (84 in) and a weight of about 6.6 kg (14½ lb). – wikipedia

So, a man used a 7 foot sword that weighed 14 1/2 pounds.  Excluding a few freaks of nature, for the most part, women cannot even hold that sword, even today’s much larger woman.  Remember we are talking about humans that lived about 400 years ago, and they were not 5’8.  The women definitely weren’t.

The Zweihander was Monstrous

So, what is hollywood trying to push when it makes women wield two handed swords, slide down banisters and kill 30 men?  Well, the answer is simple.  It’s a male fantasy porno.  Mind, you, it’s not mine.  I don’t do porno.

Please visit my legal website: Nevada DUI Attorneys
See me on YouTube: Seattle Cop Punches Black Teenage Girl

Sci-Fi is Not Porn

Stop Putting Sex Scenes in My Sci-Fi

Sci-Fi Porn Queen

Buzz Megachip, readied his phaser, peaked around the corner of the Martaplex employee lounge and found Sarah Bimbolucious.  For the next 5 minutes of the movie a sex scene ensues.  Now for the average non-sci-fi nerd, this would seem like a normal scene.  Gotta have a sex scene in a “movie”.  That might be true, except the “movie” is called “Buzz Megachip and the 3rd Quadrant”, a pure nerd-fest sci-fi flick.  The people that would be attracted to this movie are disgusted at the complete porn scene that is in them.  And, for those who do not think a sex scene is porn in a movie, let us go over exactly what is NOW shown in sex scenes:

• full frontal male nudity
• full frontal female nudity
• full back male nudity
• full back female nudity
• full sexual intercourse wide shots [ i.e. the guys bare butt, thrusting into a female, while seeing tits ]

That, my friend, is called porn.

Now, let us go over why it is a bad thing to have porn in a sci-fi.

1. once you start writing a full-fledged fleshed out porn scene in a movie, you have to get super permission from actors willing to do the scene
2. you have to pay extra for the “sex” scene
3. you then have to get people to write the “sex” scene
4. people who write “sex” scenes are not super nerd friendly sci-fi screen writers
5. there is little to no sci-fi story
6. the studio is concerned with putting butts into the seats and not nerd butts into audience seats
7. instead of pandering to the very crowd that made a particular series popular, they try to reach for a larger audience that has never even heard of Buzz Megachip, and usually alienates the very people that made the particular title popular

Yes that means that Buzz Megachip is completely short changed on the entire sci-fi story.  All these riveting “that was not cannon Buzz Megachip storyline” conversations and nerd arguments are not going to take place, after watching the movie.

Of course there is no Buzz Megachip, but this applies to all sci-fi.  In an effort to get everyone to see a movie, hollywood studios try to pander to everyone’s interests.  This is the very same argument against being politically correct.  Instead of actually defining something, they make it so general that noone likes it, or worse, everyone hates it.

 Please visit my legal website: Nevada DUI Attorneys
See me on YouTube: Seattle Cop Punches Black Teenage Girl

Honor Thy Father

Honor and Parents

Oh, Let’s Also Include…

What if I told you that there are things in the bible that were put in by people who intended, not for you to serve a god, but for you to serve man?  I bet many of you would have a really hard time believing me.  But, of those who do not believe me, what if I asked you, how many of you have looked into where each and every book, chapter and verse came from in the bible?  I bet none, who would disagree with me, have questioned the very existence of the bible itself.  Twenty years ago I had an epiphany, the bible was not true, not from god, but from man.  Then in my seeking where the bible came from, I found a very ugly fact.  The bible was written to keep poor people in place and not to question the authority of the government nor the ruling class.

For everything said about Jewish people, they seem to act the exact opposite way all other Judeo / Christian religions act.  They do not go out and recruit members.  They try to make sure you do not want to join their religion.  They treat their religion as a way of life, instead of a religion.  They do not bow down to an earthly government or ruler.  Where Christians constantly emphasize that you should pay your debts and bow down to an earthly ruler, because he obviously was put their by a god, the Jewish religion teaches that owing debt is a sin and that bowing down to a ruler is a terrible thing.  Where Christians teach you should listen to your elders and do what they say, the Jewish religion discusses the independence of an entire group of people.

Let us look at one of those submissive versus, often fondly quoted by parents to their children:

“Children, obey your parents in all things: for this is well pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged,” Colossians 3:20-21

It is utter hogwash and nothing more than indoctrinating a slave mentality.  The translation is that you should obey your parents, and by proxy, when you grow up, obey your government.  [note I am not saying overthrow your government, nor become an terrorist]  And, it was put their by English nobility to keep the peasants and slaves in check.  If you obeyed your peasant father and mother or your slave father and mother, then you would never question the authority of the nobility to rule over you.  Even today, people think it is fine to go into debt and not question the entire economic system.  It is what your parents did and their parents did.  If we consistently obey our parents and do not question their authority then we would never ask of our government the hard questions of why our parents are in the position that they are in.

My roommate is a god’s honest globalist.  He literally believes that the government will take care of us.  He literally believes that a one world government would be the best possible scenario for humanity.  He literally believes that being “American” is meaningless and personal freedom is not needed.  He feels perfectly at home with the government coming into his house, ransacking the place, taking what they want and arrest whom they please.

How could such a person exist, you might ask?  His father was a military person.  He was taught he should unquestioningly obey his parents.  He was shown that the government takes care of everything.  What is truly shocking is that his mother and father do not even like him.  Both liked his brother and sister moreso than him, due to their traditional activities, i.e. the brother was a jock and the girl was into the arts.  The brother and sister were the perfect children and my roommate was the odd-ball, quiet computer nerd.  Even given this fact, he was the first and only child in the family to sign up for the military, the marines.

I do not mean to tell you my roommates story, but to point out how twisted a mind can be if they fall prey to this propaganda set forth by nobles long dead.  What better place to put something than in the bible?  Let’s tell people they are evil and bad if they do not obey what the bible says, and then rewrite the bible to tell them to obey the nobles.  Let’s tell the people that the nobility came from god and you should therefore obey everything they say.

I challenge you to question everything you read, even the bible.  Just because your parents forced you to go to church does not mean what is said is true.  If your parents do not know, then surely you do not know.  Has your mother or father ever sat down and discussed what was said at the Council of Trent?

The holy, ecumenical and general Council of Trent, lawfully assembled in the Holy Ghost, the same three legates of the Apostolic See presiding, keeps this constantly in view, namely, that the purity of the Gospel may be preserved in the Church after the errors have been removed.

Council of Trent 1546

That’s right, ladies and gentlemen, your bible has been tampered with and edited to fit what some old white guys thought were errors in the “holy bible.”

“You’ve been hoodwinked. You’ve been had. You’ve been took. You’ve been led astray, led amok. You’ve been bamboozled.” – Malcom X

Please visit my legal website: Nevada DUI Attorneys
See me on YouTube: Seattle Cop Punches Black Teenage Girl

How to Be a Best Friend

Being a Friend

Best Friends Forever

It seems everyone has an opinion of what they want as a best friend or a “friend”.  You’ll notice that when it comes out of a guy’s mouth, no woman can be a guy’s friend, i.e. without having sex with them at one point.  Yet, it is not a requirement to be a friend to get married to a guy.  Also, a lot of women say they cannot be a friend to another woman.  I don’t know where this division in sisterhood started, but it does not have to be so.  Well I am here to set the record straight, either way, i.e. friends of the same sex or friend with the opposite sex.  It does not have to be a sordid affair or an illicit relationship.

Shakaama’s List of How to Be a Friend

Dominant Personalities with Submissive Personalities – not to sound all technical about it, but it is inevitable that a dominant person will run into a submissive person.  For everyone involved, this is the worse possible scenario, to befriend someone that is dominant to your submissiveness.  Point blank, if you are submissive to someone else, you are not equally friends, and you need to get rid of that relationship.  No matter how much candy that person gives you, you should not be “friends” with someone that dominates you.  The first rule of friendship is that it is an equal partnership.  If you are a laid back individual, then you need to go seek out other laid back individuals.

Familiarity Breeds Contempt – Friendship is all about choice.  You shouldn’t be friends with someone because you work side by side.  You shouldn’t be friends with someone because they go to the same church.  You shouldn’t be friends with someone because they hang out at the same bar as you do.  All of these scenarios have one thing in common, forced communalism.  You are simply friends with them because of a choice you made to be in a place, over and over.  Being in one place constantly, does not constitute the germination of friendship.  You did not come to work because of that person.  You did not attend church because of that person.  You did not go to a nightclub because of that person.  Do not befriend someone, simply because they are located in a place that you frequent.  This simply gives a false sense of familiarity.  Do not get me wrong.  You can meet people in places that you frequent, but do not feel obligated to be friends with someone simply because you see them often in the same place.  The reason I say this is because, you have no choice of what type of personality you will find in these places.  You are getting all of their baggage without benefit of some sort of filtration system.

Choose Your Friends – filtering out potential baggage is the best possible start of a friendship that you can do.  And, to do this you would start by joining an activity or club that someone you would want to meet, would frequent.  To do this, you should have a list of choices of what you would want in a friend:

• how much money do they make
• how much education do they have
• do they or do they not do drugs
• are they conservative
• are they communist
• are they socialist
• are they globalist
• are they corporatist
• do they have children
• are they single
• did they go to your college
• are they a jock
• are they a nerd
• are they earthy granola hippies
• do they send christmas cards
• do they remember birthdays
• do they remember your and your kid’s names
• are they thoughtful

Your list could be as specific as you want it to be.  Contrary to popular belief, making a concerted effort to go after a friendship based on your own conscience criteria is not something “evil”.  You choose who you want to surround yourself with.  It is your life.

Arguing with Friends – It is the mature person that can be friends with someone that does not agree with everything he believes in.  Your friends should not be submissive to you, nor you to them.  They should not agree to everything you say and visa versa.  On that very note, if you or they get upset, it should not be the end of the friendship.  So many people have some unspoken rule in the back of their mind that if anyone ever disagrees with them, then that person is not a true friend of theirs, and therefore should not be their friend.  This, in a word, is childish, by definition.  You can get angry with your friend.  Your friend can get angry with you.  They can disagree with you and you with them.  The adult does not take his ball and go home.  The adult listens to what he has to say, then voices his own opinion, then agrees to disagree if you cannot reach a consensus.

Taking it to Heart – If you or your friend takes everything said, to heart, and thereby gets offended, then you are friends with the wrong person.  Such a person is being submissive to a dominant personality.  If you are taking everything that someone says, to heart, then you are looking for their approval and not their friendship.  The very same thing can be said about any type of relationship you have with a person: parent / child; lovers; siblings.  You need to divest yourself of such a relationship.  If you are taking everything that your parent, lover or sibling says, to heart, then you simply need to stop talking to that person, for good.  It is not healthy.

I hate to sound so cut and dry, but people are suffering from terrible personalities and for absolutely no reason other than their parent did not sit them down and teach them how to interact with other people.  Maybe their parent fail at such things.  Most parents do, especially poor ones.  There is no need for you to torture yourself by being submissive to anyone else’s personality, including your own family.

You are the most important person on the planet.  You have to watch out for your own sanity and health.  So many people are unhealthy from outside stress and they do not realize that it is due to the relationships they have.  Their stomachs are all tied up in knots, over something someone close to them said, but go to the doctor and forget about it.  When the doctor tells them to reduce stress, they try to adjust their diet, or take long baths, yet call that very person on the phone that stresses them out and keeps them in their life.

No other person on the planet is so precious that you cannot do without them, if they are unhealthy to you.

Friends Before Lovers – Everyone talks about love [and by love I mean lust], but noone talks about friendship.  I say, before you are lovers, you should be friends.  You should marry your best friend, not your best sex partner.  A friend can argue with you, laugh with you, call you, pick up your spirits, cry on your shoulder and just sit with you while you read a book or the paper.  This is what a wife should do.  This is what a husband should do.  People go about getting married backwards, i.e. be lovers first then try and grow into a friendship.

You should seek out a friend, before seeking out a lover.  You should have ten girl friends, instead of ten girl-friends.  Then, you can choose which girl friend you would like to marry, and visa versa.  If your girl-friend is financially ruinous to you, and you go about it the normal way, and not my way, you are ruined for life.  If you go the way I suggest, you would already know that the girl is bad news with money, and you’d just keep her as a friend and nothing more.  However, the current way of doing things, you date someone and proceed to marry them, before you discover what a terrible friend they are for you, after the fact.

You want to hedge your bets against getting a divorce?  Befriend a lady before dating her.  This might seem counterintuitive to getting a mate.  The adult does not hand out, “Do you like me? X yes X no” cards.  First, make your friendship list rules, go find friends that fit into those rules and make sure some of them are of the opposite sex.  Then, when you have determined that one of the women are up to your standards, start dating her.  If she can argue with you, laugh with you, call you, pick up your spirits, cry on your shoulder and just sit with you while you read a book or the paper, then getting married to her should, almost be, a sure bet that you would never get a divorce.

Please visit my legal website: Nevada DUI Attorneys
See me on YouTube: Seattle Cop Punches Black Teenage Girl

An Investment Banker Explains the Subprime Debacle

Understanding the Subprime Catastrophe

I will broach no more insult to Wall Street for its handling of the sub-prime crisis.  They have, with much aplomb, steadfastly applied the best and brightest to controlling and handling the entire sub-prime catastrophe.  The fact of the matter is that millions of Americans were at fault.  They sneakily signed mortgages for immense houses, at ridiculous interest rates, all the while being completely destitute and unemployed to boot.  I say we put all of those fraudulent buyers behind bars.  They are, without a doubt, the most base of humanity.  They dare ask for a handout after signing these ARM loans that they connived their way into.  If it were not for Hank Paulson and Tim Geithner, shelling out untold trillions for huge banks, to halt their failure, since they are obviously too big to fail, we would be in a complete recession of the economy.  Finally, these charlatans, offered to pay 30% or even more for the same house that only just sold, on the market, not months before.  It is these folks that we all owe the loss of our 401k investment crashes to.  How many lost money on the stock market, in their retirement funds, when the stock market is supposed to only go up.  These idiot borrowers are the cause of all of this mayhem.  They then complained to the government that they over-payed for their houses.  And, that they were upside down in their houses.  It is their own fault for forcing good honest realtors and home inspectors to have to raise the home price at their request.

Please visit my legal website: Las Vegas Nevada DUI Penalties
See me on YouTube: Seattle Cope Punches Black Teenage Girl

How to Understand the Credit Crunch (video)

The Credit Crunch in a Nut Shell

It goes without saying that the most sophisticated and intelligent people are located on a few blocks we all like to call Wall Street.  Under the circumstances noone can possibly understand all the goings on, that happen on that stretch of land on the planet.  Who can blame you really?  You aren’t as bright, not as well seasoned, nor are you as morally pure as say, a Wall Street investment banker.  They are, without a doubt, the most astute beings on the planet.  To say that they were taken unawares by credit crunch, simply begs the question of your own lack of understanding of the crisis.  They most certainly understood and foresaw everything that was going to happen.

On the one hand, we had those thousands of smaller banks who were clandestinely handing out predatory loans.  It is only fitting then that the larger banks and financial institutions, who never practiced such morally reprehensible business, be rewarded with tax payer money, so they could buy up all those thousands of banks to stop their scandalous business practices.  It is reprehensible that ma & pa banks and local credit unions spread their ilk across the land handing out dirty loans to an unsuspecting public, all the while telling them that their ARM loans were fixed rate mortgages.

It goes without saying that, this is exactly why the U.S. government handed out billions to credit card companies, to protect the citizens from these tiny monsters that were providing capital to the citizens at insanely high interest rates.  We can thank the government that no one’s credit cards were closed or limits lowered.  Huge financial instutitions thankfully were never deeply indebted.  I mean, we are talking about the best and brightest here.  And, they, of course, were never over-leveraged to any degree.  It was all those tiny lenders that had made insanely risky loans, and even worse, compounded the matter by engaging in financial mayhem like mortgage-backed bonds, leveraged-buyout loans and high-yield, or junk, bonds.  We are thankful the government had the foresight to continue with the trickle down theory policy of spreading the tax payer wealth.  For some reason the government continues to borrow money at interest from the Federal Reserve Bank, at interest, instead of printing its own money.  I mean, they’re they federal government, they have a treasury department.  But, it’s all the fault of those thousands of small banks and credit unions that conspired to raise the U.S. debt by forcing our policy makers into giving out tax payer money to banks too big to fail and credit card companies.

I thank God for people like Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, who are safeguarding the purse strings of America.  And, with Paulson and Geithner at the helm of the piggy bank, we can sleep soundly.

Please visit my legal website: Las Vegas Nevada DUI Penalties
See me on YouTube: Seattle Cope Punches Black Teenage Girl

How to Understand U.S. Foreign Policy (video)

U.S. Foreign Policy and Military Democracy

Noone can say that America is not without complete understanding of the minds of foreign countries.  The presidency has always been the bastion of democracy on the planet.  Only the most forthright and intellectual individual is ever elected to the highest office of the land, sometimes repeatedly.  If noone else is qualified for the job of President of the World, I mean, of the United States, then it is the duty of those whore are most qualified, eloquent of speech, of good moral character, and of sound reason to be reelected, by a generous and politically savvy constituency.

Militarily speaking, only the most moral of reason has the U.S. ever used its military forces around the globe.  And, we only use our military with the utmost economic efficiency.  Any officer in the military that has one iota of conscience will forthwith inform his superior officers, or even the presidency, that they will not be used in any manner that is not 100% in a purely defensive matter to protect U.S. soil.  Ours is the shining example of how a military should be run.  Our troops wash their own clothes, engineer their own weapons and do every possible thing, in-house, to keep our military running at peak efficiency.  Of course they have to, because it is how tax payer dollars should be spent.  Our military can hold their head high and say they would never be used for any sordid economic use.  Our military stands ready to defend us from any foreign invaders.

It is simply amazing how many countries clamor to beg that we come and demonstrate to them how democracy can be practiced in their country.  It is the only reason, and a fantastic one at that, that we send our troops to ensure the safety of our instructors of democracy.  It is a small price to pay, but every American proudly pays taxes to aid our military being used in such a manner.  And, those instructors of democracy have their hands full.  It is very hard, sometimes, to get a good interpreter in those countries, since they sometimes don’t speak English over there.

Yes, U.S. foreign policy is so moral and right.  After all, the country was founded by good Christian men, none of whom touched whine, women nor owned slaves.  We can put our full faith and trust in such men to come up with a system, that we still adhere to, to the letter, to this very day.  To that end, we have sent so many diplomats overseas, to help those poor countries write just such a constitution for themselves.

Please visit my legal website: Las Vegas Nevada DUI Penalties
See me on YouTube: Seattle Cop Punches Black Teenage Girl

Assassination Attempt on Arizona Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords

Congresswoman Still Sedated After Gunman’s Attack

By PAULINE ARRILLAGA, Associated Press TUCSON, Ariz. – Rep. Gabrielle Giffords remained heavily sedated and in critical condition Sunday as investigators sought to understand what motivated a gunman to carry out an assassination attempt on the Democratic lawmaker in a rampage that killed six people.

University Medical Center spokeswoman Darci Slaten told The Associated Press that Giffords underwent a two-hour surgery Saturday and has not been conscious since the shooting. She said more information will be released at a news conference in which one of the doctors who operated on Giffords plans to speak.

Rep. Gabrielle Giffords

Outside of the hospital, candles flickered at a makeshift memorial. Signs read “Peace + love are stronger,” “God bless America and “We love you, Gabrielle.” People also laid down bouquets of flowers, American flags and pictures of Giffords.

Authorities said Gifford, 40, was targeted at a public gathering by a man with a semiautomatic weapon around 10 a.m. Saturday outside a busy Tucson supermarket. Arizona’s chief federal judge and five others were killed and 13 people were wounded, including the Democrat lawmaker.

He also fired at her district director and shot indiscriminately at staffers and others standing in line to talk to the congresswoman, said Mark Kimble, a communications staffer for Giffords.

“He was not more than three or four feet from the congresswoman and the district director,” Kimble said, describing the scene as “just complete chaos, people screaming, crying.”

Pima County Sheriff Clarence Dupnik said the rampage ended only after two people tackled the gunman.

“He was definitely on a mission,” said Villec, a former Giffords intern.

Police say the shooter was in custody, and was identified by people familiar with the investigation as Jared Loughner, 22. U.S. officials who provided his name to the AP spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to release it publicly.

His motivation was not immediately known, but Dupnik described him as mentally unstable and possibly acting with an accomplice.

His office said a man possibly associated with the suspect who was near the scene was being sought. The man, who was photographed by a security camera, was described as white with dark hair and 40-45 years old.

The assassination attempt left Americans questioning whether divisive politics had pushed the suspect over the edge.

A shaken President Barack Obama called the attack “a tragedy for our entire country.”

Attorney General Eric Holder said in a statement Sunday that FBI Director Robert Mueller was traveling to Arizona to help coordinate the investigation.

Rep. Gabrielle Giffords

In a brief statement Sunday morning, House Speaker John Boehner said flags on the House side of the Capitol in Washington will be flown at half staff to honor Giffords’ slain aide, Gabe Zimmerman. Boehner says normal House business this week is postponed to focus on any necessary actions in the shooting aftermath.

Strong reaction came from overseas, as well.

British Prime Minister David Cameron expressed shock at the shooting, and added that he shared President Barack Obama’s belief that “we must never allow violence and hate to extinguish the open political discourse which is our surest protection.”

Fidel Castro also denounced the attack as atrocious. “Even those of us who don’t share at all the politics and philosophies (of the Obama administration) sincerely desire that no children, judges, legislators or citizens of the United States die in such an absurd and unjustifiable way,” Castro said in an opinion piece titled “An Atrocious Act,” published in Cuban state-controlled media.

Giffords is a moderate Democrat who narrowly won re-election in November against a tea party candidate who sought to throw her from office over her support of the health care law. Anger over her position became violent at times, with her Tucson office vandalized after the House passed the overhaul last March and someone showing up at a recent gathering with a weapon.

Authorities said the dead included U.S. District Judge John Roll, 63; Christina Greene, 9; Giffords aide Zimmerman, 30; Dorothy Morris, 76; Dorwin Stoddard, 76; and Phyllis Scheck, 79.

The sheriff blamed the vitriolic political rhetoric that has consumed the country, much of it occurring in Arizona.

Giffords expressed similar concern, even before the shooting. In an interview after her office was vandalized, she referred to the animosity against her by conservatives, including Sarah Palin’s decision to list Giffords’ seat as one of the top “targets” in the midterm elections.

“For example, we’re on Sarah Palin’s targeted list, but the thing is, that the way that she has it depicted has the crosshairs of a gun sight over our district. When people do that, they have to realize that there are consequences to that action,” Giffords said in an interview with MSNBC.

In the hours after the shooting, Palin issued a statement in which she expressed her “sincere condolences” to the family of Giffords and the other victims.

During his campaign effort to unseat Giffords in November, Republican challenger Jesse Kelly held fundraisers where he urged supporters to help remove Giffords from office by joining him to shoot a fully loaded M-16 rifle. Kelly is a former Marine who served in Iraq and was pictured on his website in military gear holding his automatic weapon and promoting the event.

“I don’t see the connection,” between the fundraisers featuring weapons and Saturday’s shooting, said John Ellinwood, Kelly’s spokesman. “I don’t know this person, we cannot find any records that he was associated with the campaign in any way. I just don’t see the connection.

“Arizona is a state where people are firearms owners — this was just a deranged individual.”

Rep. Gabrielle Giffords

Law enforcement officials said members of Congress reported 42 cases of threats or violence in the first three months of 2010, nearly three times the 15 cases reported during the same period a year earlier. Nearly all dealt with the health care bill, and Giffords was among the targets.

The shooting cast a pall over the Capitol as politicians of all stripes denounced the attack as a horrific. Capitol police asked members of Congress to be more vigilant about security in the wake of the shooting. Obama dispatched his FBI chief to Arizona.

Slaten said nine other wounded were being treated at the hospital, four of them critical and five of them serious. Slaten said the three others were treated at other hospitals and released.

Giffords spokesman C.J. Karamargin said besides the aide Zimmerman, who was killed, two other Giffords staffers were shot but expected to survive. Zimmerman was a former social worker who served as Giffords’ director of community outreach.

Greg Segalini, an uncle of Christina, the 9-year-old victim, told the Arizona Republic that a neighbor was going to the event and invited her along because she had just been elected to the student council and was interested in government.

Christina, who was born on Sept. 11, 2001, was involved in many activities, from ballet to baseball. She had just received her first Holy Communion at St. Odilia’s Catholic Church in Tucson, Catholic Diocese of Tucson officials told The Arizona Daily Star.

The suspect Loughner was described by a former classmate as a pot-smoking loner, and the Army said he tried to enlist in December 2008 but was rejected for reasons not disclosed.

Federal law enforcement officials were poring over versions of a MySpace page that included a mysterious “Goodbye friends” message published hours before the shooting and exhorted his friends to “Please don’t be mad at me.” In one of several YouTube videos, which featured text against a dark background, Loughner described inventing a new U.S. currency and complained about the illiteracy rate among people living in Giffords’ congressional district in Arizona.

“I know who’s listening: Government Officials, and the People,” Loughner wrote. “Nearly all the people, who don’t know this accurate information of a new currency, aren’t aware of mind control and brainwash methods. If I have my civil rights, then this message wouldn’t have happen (sic).”

In Loughner’s middle-class neighborhood — about a five-minute drive from the scene — sheriff’s deputies had much of the street blocked off. The neighborhood sits just off a bustling Tucson street and is lined with desert landscaping and palm trees.

Neighbors said Loughner lived with his parents and kept to himself. He was often seen walking his dog, almost always wearing a hooded sweat shirt and listening to his iPod.

Loughner’s MySpace profile indicates he attended and graduated from school in Tucson and had taken college classes. He did not say if he was employed.

High school classmate Grant Wiens, 22, said Loughner seemed to be “floating through life” and “doing his own thing.”

“Sometimes religion was brought up or drugs. He smoked pot, I don’t know how regularly. And he wasn’t too keen on religion, from what I could tell,” Wiens said.

Lynda Sorenson said she took a math class with Loughner last summer at Pima Community College’s Northwest campus and told the Arizona Daily Star he was “obviously very disturbed.” “He disrupted class frequently with nonsensical outbursts,” she said.

In October 2007, Loughner was cited in Pima County for possession of drug paraphernalia, which was dismissed after he completed a diversion program, according to online records.

Giffords was first elected to Congress amid a wave of Democratic victories in the 2006 election, and has been mentioned as a possible Senate candidate in 2012 and a gubernatorial prospect in 2014.

She is married to astronaut Mark E. Kelly, who has piloted space shuttles Endeavour and Discovery. The two met in China in 2003 while they were serving on a committee there, and were married in January 2007. Sen. Bill Nelson, chairman of the Senate Commerce Space and Science Subcommittee, said Kelly is training to be the next commander of the space shuttle mission slated for April. His brother is currently serving aboard the International Space Station, Nelson said.

---

Associated Press Writers Amanda Lee Myers and Terry Tang in Tucson, Jacques Billeaud, Bob Christie and Paul Davenport in Phoenix, and David Espo, Matt Apuzzo, Eileen Sullivan, Adam Goldman and Charles Babington in Washington contributed to this report.

 Please visit my legal website: Las Vegas Nevada DUI Penalties
See me on YouTube: Seattle Cop Punches Black Teenage Girl

Who Oversees the Federal Reserve Bank

Who Regulates the Fed

In a word, noone.  Officially, we have the propaganda that the federal reserve system is a quasi-governmental entity, but with semi-private privileges.  The explanation however goes in loops and tries to circumnavigate a very concise explanation. No one in government oversees the Fed.  No one in government can overrule the Fed.  No one can hold accountable the Fed.  No one in government can bring to justice the Fed.  In fact, the Fed is untouchable.  In fact, the Fed is above the law.  In fact, the Fed operates with impunity.

The Official Explanation of Who Regulates the Federal Reserve Banks

The Federal Reserve is a unique legal entity that can be described as an independent government agency with member bank participation. It is organized with a 100% government agency at the top (the Board of Governors), and branches beneath them that are organized like corporations with member banks as shareholders.(Ref: http://www.federalreserveeducation.org/fed101/structure/ , http://www.federalreserve.gov/generalinfo/faq/faqfrs.htm#4 )

The Board of Governors are all appointed for 14-year terms by the president and confirmed by congress. It operates per it’s charter and laws set by congress. it is overseen by congress. There is no structure or mechanism for private ownership at this level; it is a government agency. You can confirm this from a number of government sites that list it as a government agency (e.g. http://www.whitehouse.gov/government/independent-agencies.html) Board members are forbidden by law to have any economic interest in a private bank. (Ref: Title 12 chapter 3 of the U.S. Legal Code). The Board determines monetary policy and provides high level oversight of the branches.

The 12 branches can be considered highly regulated private corporations. Member banks are required to buy shares in their branch. Each bank has one vote. They can vote for 6 of their 9 board members, the other 3 are appointed by the Board of Governors. Though the branches are called non-profit, the member banks get a standard 6% dividend on their shares. The remaining ‘profit’ is turned over to the Treasury at the end of the year.

For confirmation on this, check out how Hoovers classifies them:
http://www.hoovers.com/free/search/simple/xmillion/index.xhtml?query_string=Federal+Reserve&which=company&page=1&x=91&y=2# HooversCompanyNameMatchesH2

And those shares that the member banks own? Some say there are so many restrictions that it falls short of true ownership

From Edward Griffin, noted anti-fed intellect (http://www.bigeye.com/griffin.htm)

“It’s a hybrid, part corporation and part government, part private, part government.
..
Every bank that’s in the system is an owner of the Federal Reserve… But that’s as far as it goes because those stock certificates do not carry with them any of the attributes of private ownership. For example, the holders of these certificates cannot sell them. If you can’t sell something then you don’t really own it, that’s one of the tests of ownership, your ability to dispose of it. You cannot sell it. Furthermore the larger banks put up more money than the smaller banks, it’s a ratio to their assets, so the larger banks have more stock certificates in the system than the small ones and yet regardless of the number that they hold, every bank has just one vote. There’s another violation of the principle of private ownership. Furthermore that vote doesn’t buy them anything. They can’t vote for anything of substance; they cannot vote for their national management which is the most important thing, isn’t it? The board of directors and chairman of the Federal Reserve System are appointed by the President, they’re not elected by the banks that are part of the system, the President does that.”

But, let’s go over a couple of things in this explanation.  Bear in mind what I said earlier, that noone can oversee them.

The Board of Governors are all appointed for 14-year terms by the president and confirmed by congress

This is a red herring.  It assumes that because of some appointment power, that the government has some authority over the bank.  On print that looks great.  In practice, this is nothing more than Napoleon making the Pope crown him.  The “appointees” are hand picked and given to the president and congress.  They wouldn’t dare choose anyone but those who they were told to choose.

  It operates per it’s charter and laws set by congress. it is overseen by congress.

Again, this looks great on paper, but in practice it is just not done.  No congressman can sit in on any federal reserve meeting.  Congress is not advised of the goings on of the meetings.  In fact, congress is told, quite frequently, to shut-up asking about the meetings.  Not only that, but should congress hand the Fed something, congress is well aware that they cannot then ask about the very object they handed to the Fed.

Board members are forbidden by law to have any economic interest in a private bank. (Ref: Title 12 chapter 3 of the U.S. Legal Code). The Board determines monetary policy and provides high level oversight of the branches.

If I sent a simpleton to your house to borrow your sugar, and then fed the simpleton cookies, made from the very sugar I had him borrow, can it be said that the simpleton has not profited from the sugar?  Much is made of this clause that the Fed members cannot have interest in a private bank.  But, what is not said that there are many “non-private” banks.  In fact, as we’ll see, the board holds interest in the Federal Reserve Banks.

Member banks are required to buy shares in their branch. Each bank has one vote. They can vote for 6 of their 9 board members, the other 3 are appointed by the Board of Governors. Though the branches are called non-profit, the member banks get a standard 6% dividend on their shares.

 This might look standard until you valuate how much profit the Fed makes each year.  And, again the board does in fact hold interest in a bank, just not a private one.  Where do the Fed profits come from?  The Federal Reserve Bank makes profits off of the taxpayers of America.

And those shares that the member banks own? Some say there are so many restrictions that it falls short of true ownership

Who cares about the restrictions of ownership if you have 6% of every dollar ever printed in America.  This is just another red herring.  The “restrictions” in question forbid the holder of the shares from being able to sell them.  But, correct me if I am wrong but, who on the planet would be insane enough to sell a share in the monetary system of America?  It is literally like having a share in God, with a restriction that you cannot sell a share in God.  What exactly would you trade a share in God for?  It is literally, by definition, the logical fallacy of false dilemma. This line of “reasoning” is fallacious because if both claims could be false, then it cannot be inferred that one is true because the other is false.

• I have shares in the Federal Reserve Bank
• I cannot have a conflict of interest when dealing with taxpayer money, which the bank makes profits off of
• I cannot trade my shares
• therefore I must be trustworthy and have absolutely no conflict of interest

This was literally drafted into the article creating the Fed, to confuse people and give a sense of propriety to an organization that is literally pillaging the entire country.

We literally have a private bank that is funneling money through it’s coffers and then doling it out to its friends, its own banks.

If it can be believed, the bank has had people killed that came against it.  Some even say Lincoln and Kennedy were shot by the bank.

Bankers killed Lincoln: In this conspiracy scenario, John Wilkes Booth was the “hit man,” the “hired gun” for the powerful British bankers, the Rothschilds. According to this assassination theory, the Rothschilds had offered loans to the Lincoln administration at very high interest, assuming that the Union had no choice other than to accept their outrageous terms. The frugal and resourceful frontiersman spirit in Lincoln caused him to refuse the Rothschilds’ offer and to acquire the necessary funds elsewhere. Although his refusal only stung their sense of pride and greed, the true reason for their planning his assassination was their knowledge that after the war Lincoln’s policies indicated a mild Reconstruction of the South that would encourage a resumption of agriculture rather than industry. Additional post-war policies destroyed the Rothschilds’ commodity speculations. With Lincoln out of the way, the Rothschilds planned to exploit the weaknesses of the United States and take over its economy.

“…Predictably Lincoln, needing money to finance his war effort, went with his secretary of the treasury to New York to apply for the necessary loans. The money changers wishing the Union to fail offered loans at 24% to 36%. Lincoln declined the offer. An old friend of Lincoln’s, Colonel Dick Taylor of Chicago was put in charge of solving the problem of how to finance the war. His solution is recorded as this. ‘Just get Congress to pass a bill authorising the printing of full legal tender treasury notes… and pay your soldiers with them and go ahead and win your war with them also.’

When Lincoln asked if the people of America would accept the notes Taylor said. ‘The people or anyone else will not have any choice in the matter, if you make them full legal tender. They will have the full sanction of the government and be just as good as any money; as Congress is given that express right by the Constitution.’

Lincoln agreed to try this solution and printed 450 million dollars worth of the new bills using green ink on the back to distinguish them from other notes. “The government should create, issue and circulate all the currency and credit needed to satisfy the spending power of the government and the buying power of consumers….. The privilege of creating and issuing money is not only the supreme prerogative of Government, but it is the Government’s greatest creative opportunity. By the adoption of these principles, the long-felt want for a uniform medium will be satisfied. The taxpayers will be saved immense sums of interest, discounts and exchanges. The financing of all public enterprises, the maintenance of stable government and ordered progress, and the conduct of the Treasury will become matters of practical administration. The people can and will be furnished with a currency as safe as their own government. Money will cease to be the master and become the servant of humanity. Democracy will rise superior to the money power. The solution worked so well Lincoln was seriously considering adopting this emergency measure as a permanent policy. This would have been great for everyone except the money changers who quickly realised how dangerous this policy would be for them….”

On Kennedy:

On June 4, 1963, a virtually unknown Presidential decree, Executive Order 11110, was signed with the authority to basically strip the Federal Reserve Bank of its power to loan money to the United States Federal Government at interest. With the stroke of a pen, President Kennedy declared that the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank would soon be out of business. The Christian Law Fellowship has exhaustively researched this matter through the Federal Register and Library of Congress. We can now safely conclude that this Executive Order has never been repealed, amended, or superceded by any subsequent Executive Order. In simple terms, it is still valid.

When President John Fitzgerald Kennedy – the author of Profiles in Courage -signed this Order, it returned to the federal government, specifically the Treasury Department, the Constitutional power to create and issue currency -money – without going through the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank. President Kennedy’s Executive Order 11110 [the full text is displayed further below] gave the Treasury Department the explicit authority: “to issue silver certificates against any silver bullion, silver, or standard silver dollars in the Treasury.” This means that for every ounce of silver in the U.S. Treasury’s vault, the government could introduce new money into circulation based on the silver bullion physically held there. As a result, more than $4 billion in United States Notes were brought into circulation in $2 and $5 denominations. $10 and $20 United States Notes were never circulated but were being printed by the Treasury Department when Kennedy was assassinated. It appears obvious that President Kennedy knew the Federal Reserve Notes being used as the purported legal currency were contrary to the Constitution of the United States of America.

“United States Notes” were issued as an interest-free and debt-free currency backed by silver reserves in the U.S. Treasury. We compared a “Federal Reserve Note” issued from the private central bank of the United States (the Federal Reserve Bank a/k/a Federal Reserve System), with a “United States Note” from the U.S. Treasury issued by President Kennedy’s Executive Order. They almost look alike, except one says “Federal Reserve Note” on the top while the other says “United States Note”. Also, the Federal Reserve Note has a green seal and serial number while the United States Note has a red seal and serial number.

President Kennedy was assassinated on November 22, 1963 and the United States Notes he had issued were immediately taken out of circulation. Federal Reserve Notes continued to serve as the legal currency of the nation. According to the United States Secret Service, 99% of all U.S. paper “currency” circulating in 1999 are Federal Reserve Notes.

Kennedy knew that if the silver-backed United States Notes were widely circulated, they would have eliminated the demand for Federal Reserve Notes. This is a very simple matter of economics. The USN was backed by silver and the FRN was not backed by anything of intrinsic value. Executive Order 11110 should have prevented the national debt from reaching its current level (virtually all of the nearly $9 trillion in federal debt has been created since 1963) if LBJ or any subsequent President were to enforce it. It would have almost immediately given the U.S. Government the ability to repay its debt without going to the private Federal Reserve Banks and being charged interest to create new “money”. Executive Order 11110 gave the U.S.A. the ability to, once again, create its own money backed by silver and realm value worth something.

In the intelligence community, there is a saying,  “In the business of covert ops, there are no such things as coincidences.”.  Putting forward a very easy scapegoat for the public to see is the “birdie” the photographer uses to placate the public.  Keep your eyes on the conveniently placed presidential assassin that suddenly appeared on the doorsteps of the FBI.  Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain.  It could not possibly be that these presidents sought to overthrow the banking power houses and ended up dead by their hands.

Please visit my legal website: Las Vegas Nevada DUI Penalties
See me on YouTube: Seattle Cope Punches Black Teenage Girl

For Blacks: Are You Living Above Your Means?

Is There More Bill Than Paycheck?

More Bill Than Paycheck

All jokes aside, if the answer is yes, without you even looking at your checkbook, then you need to get out of the house you’re in and move back with your family.  And, I am not kidding.  Black folks pay the highest in the country, for basic housing than any other racial group.*  While everyone else likes to talk about stupid stuff, the numbers do not lie.  In my Black Financial New Years Resolution I discussed a plan to save money and buy rental property for yourself and your family, to generate cash flow.

America has just had a tremendous wake-up call.  The call said, “hello you’re living above your means, it’s time to pay up.”  And pay up everyone has.  Even the people that could afford their houses have suffered, in being upside down in their house.  They are only staying in them out of hopes that their property will go back up.  The bottom line is, we all fell for a pipe dream from a snake-oil salesman.

To keep this short, calculate this:   

• Maximum housing expense ratio = annual salary x 0.28 / 12 (months)
• Maximum allowable debt-to-income ratio = annual salary x 0.36 / 12 (months)

1. are all your living expenses below 28% of your monthly salary?
2. are you saving at least 30% of your salary, or investing it in something monthly?
3. do you have around 30% of disposable income, from which you buy food and clothing?

If those numbers do not add up then you’re living above your means.  If at least number 1 isn’t true, then you are definitely living above your means.

Fix it.  You need to fix #1 immediately.  If you are renting, get out of it ASAP.  If you have to pay for an early termination of a contract and it won’t be the same as paying all of the months of the contract, then get out of the contract.  Either move somewhere where the housing is only 20% of your income, or move back home.  You need to put aside this notion that going into debt to live alone means you’re somehow an adult.  This “I got mine, you get yours” attitude is why we’re in this mess to begin with.

In this financial crisis, more Black wealth has been completely gutted and stolen by banks than in any other time in history.  While white people hear the news and think white people are suffering, whole sections of the Black population has been ousted, foreclosed on and assets seized.  In Memphis alone the Black part of town is now a ghost town due to foreclosures.  Predatory lending to Black folks was turned into an art form.

Before Black people buy a house, they should get a Black lawyer and go over the proposed loans with them.  If you want my personal opinion, you should pay cash for your house and try and squeeze every discount you can out of the property before buying it.  Never get emotionally attached to property.  More wealth has been squandered due to emotional outbursts and attachments to a piece of land than any other factor.  Once someone figures out that you care for a piece of land, they tend to rake you over the coals.  Trust me, there is nothing special about one section of land, more than another section of land, especially if we are talking that it will ruin you financially.

If You Are Living Above Your Means, Fix It!

Please visit my legal website: Las Vegas Nevada DUI Penalties
See me on YouTube: Seattle Cop Punches Black Teenage Girl

For Blacks: Mo Money in 2011?

My Financial Suggestions for Negros in 2011

Hello brothers and sisters!  Happy new year.  I hope you sat down at your desk and mapped out your year and planned everything you would “like” to do this year.  But, what about what you would like to financially achieve this year?  Very often Black folks, or even Americans in general, do not sit down at the beginning of a year and plan ahead for their finances.  Trust me on this one when I say, when you write it down, just the act alone, seems to help you achieve it.  I am always harping on what Black folks won’t do.  So I like to put my money where my mouth is, and we’ll go through this together and suggest what ought to be done.  Ever hear of a Black leader that does that?  They’re so quick to tell you what shouldn’t be done.  Black preachers climb the pulpit every Sunday and tell you what you can’t do.  Black “leaders”, a.k.a. NAACP wannabes, delight in telling you how you’ve been wronged.  But, not a damn one of them empower us.  Not a damn one of them tell us what we can do.

I don’t think Black people have financial education.  I am no Warren Buffet but I will share with you some financial ideas that I think even the most financially uneducated brother or sister can not only understand, but financially do.

This Year’s Financial Planning for Black People

I am going to tell you some things that might seem counter to what all the financial gurus are talking about.  But, what you don’t know is most of those financial gurus are not talking to you.  They are talking to people who have $150,000 saved in the bank.  Do you know the average social security retiree has a whopping $50,000 saved in their social 401k plan?  There is no way they can retire off of that.  So all these speeches about what you should do with your money does not apply to you.  [and me]  We do not have the basic of the basic already sorted out, have at least $50,000 in savings alone.  So if I say something that doesn’t jive with what your financial hero is telling you, understand that your financial hero makes about $300,000 a year and think everyone has $50,000 saved in the bank ALREADY.

The Easy Way to Save

Before you can save you have to get your spending under control.  If you go to a store more than twice a month, you are out of control.  That is including groceries.  Basically the idea is that most Americans are living waaaaaaaaaaaaaaay above their means.  They are shopping non-stop.  They are paying for things they do not need.

There are far more rich people that lived below their means and saved up, than there are that wandered into a pot of gold.  There are far more rich people that were stingy with their money than those that had riches fall in their lap.  Being wealthy takes planning and commitment.  Don’t be afraid of the word wealthy either.  I consider wealthy to also cover how great your family is, spiritually.  Oh and by the way, these days having one million dollars is not considered rich anymore.

Now, all the financial gurus tell you that saving your money works against you.  The Federal Reserve Bank prints a cool $50 million a day.  That’s right! A Day!  That means the $50 you put in your bank every paycheck by the time you walk out the door, is really only worth about $45.  Just that fast inflation is eating your money.  Now couple that with the fact of capital gains tax, which is %15 off of what you make in a savings account.  Right now across the land it’s a bleak 1% OR LESS.  So if inflation of 5% and an additional 15% don’t get you, your own spending will get you.

So why am I even discussing savings?  Because you have to have a foundation before you can anything with money.  You cannot talk about sound investing if you have no money to invest.  You do know that, at a minimum people are talking about having $20,000 or $30,000, when they are discussing investing.  And, they expect you to have that saved by age 26 or so.  So if you don’t have that, all of that discussion doesn’t even apply to you.

I asked my bank if my account was terrible, two different banks told me that 90% of their account holders did not have enough in their account to buy an expensive meal.

So what can we do to save money? There is a financial term called a DRIP program.  It stands for dividend reinvestment program.  It means that you buy into the direct shares of a company, below the minimum of what a normal investor would have to pay, about $1,000.  Your buy in is then kept by the company and as your little money stays, they pay you an exact portion of what you make off of your “stock”, when they pay out dividends.  However, instead of you getting the money, for your tiny portion, the company reinvests the money to buy you more stocks.  So, for instance, if you were to buy into the Proctor & Gamble DRIP program with $500, come time for them to pay out dividends, they take the $5 you earned and buy you more stock.  So you end up with $505 worth of stock in the company.  Over a long period of time, you might end up with 20,000 shares from just a tiny amount.

My suggestion is for you to apply the same principle to yourself and your savings account.  Most people put all of their money into their checking account so they can pay off bills and such, or buy groceries.  That is fine.  As long as you keep an up-to-date checkbook you will never go into the hole.  Setup your own DRIP program from your checking account, to your savings account.  Unless your bank is in the stone age, you can go online and do this.

Setup a daily or weekly transfer from your checking account to your savings account.  Now the amount is going to be the big question.  Put too little in and reaching $30,000 will take forever.  Put too much in, and unless you are really in control of your spending, you might run the risk of getting in trouble.  In trouble because the savings account is to be treated as if it is untouchable.  Under no circumstances can you take out money from your savings account.  That is the whole point of it being a “savings” account.

Think of it in terms of how much you are personally worth every day.  Let’s say you make $100 a day.  Of that $100 how much goes to direct, unquestionable, expenses, i.e. rent, power, water, gasoline / transportation?  Now remember this is daily.  Let’s say $50 a day covers all your expenses.  Then you might have $20 in questionable expenses, i.e. cell phone bills.  That leaves you with $30 a day to play around with.  Let’s say you put that into your savings account, which gives you 1% interest:

• $210 a week or $30 a day
• 1% interest rate
• compounded monthly

That comes out to be $114,855.00 after 10 years.

Let’s say you only put in $10 a day, at 1% interest into a savings account

• $70 a week or $10 a day
• 1% interest rate
• compounded monthly

That comes out to be $38, 285.00 after 10 years.

You can see right off that aggressively saving is going to get you there faster.  If your goal is to get to $30,000 it would take you 3 years if you only saved $30 a day or $210 a week at 1% interest.  To get to $30,000 in one year at 1% interest rate you would have to save $80 a day.

Now most black folk only think of themselves, by themselves.  Let’s think outside the box right quick.  Imagine that your entire family contributed to the savings account.  You could probably easily save $80 a day, or more.  If you consolidated your families expenses by moving together and sharing the expenses, you could probably cut everyone’s expenses in half.  Yes, I am talking about your grown children moving home, or you moving in with your grown children.  Outside of the U.S. people live with their extended family under the same roof, quite frequently.  And, before you start going down the path thinking I’m talking about some poor 3rd world country, I am talking about Europe, very wealthy countries.  Only Americans consider it their duty to move out and double their expenses, like idiots.  Or worse, get into a house that takes away more than 30% of their salary.  You do know that mortgage lenders do not want to lend you any money if all of your monthly debts exceed 36%.  That includes house note, car note, cell phone bill, power, water, garbage, property taxes, gas bill.  So if you made $100 a day, you better not have more than $36 a day in total bills.  That is $1080 a month in bills.  If you are paying more than that, in total bills, you are living WELLLLL above your means, i.e. you’re broke.

What Can I Do With Thirty-Thousand Dollars in One Year?

So we are going to save this $30,000 this year.  The next question is, what do i do with it?  No we are not going to spend it all.  We are going to go into business for our selves / family.  Of all the business ventures you could go into, real estate is still the safest to get into.  With $30,000 you can leverage yourself into most single family properties, that you are going to rent out to someone.

So the plan is to get into a nice single family home and rent it out for “cash flow”.  First you have to prepare yourself.  Buy every real estate book you can get your hand on.  Keep in mind, no one book is going to have all the answers.  Even text book real estate books, do not have all the answers.

Next, become an expert in accounting. Read everything you can on accounting.  If you do not know about money, you will never keep money.  Understand that accounting is only going to tell you how money is tabulated.  However, it is a basic principle that is unquestionably necessary to learn.  Every Black person in America should know accounting to the advanced level.

Next, comes understanding taxes.  Every Black person in America should learn taxes inside and out.  So many Black people are raped by the federal, state and local government through taxes, it isn’t even funny.  And, I used the word rape literally.  Black folks pay, per capita, the highest taxes of any other racial group and yet have the lowest median household income in the entire nation.*  There has got to be an end to it.  Know your taxes.  Take advantage of tax shelters and tax deductions.  Your children are your biggest way to save yourself from taxes.  While you keep pushing them away and telling them stupid crap like, “man up” and move out the house, you’re killing yourself with taxes.  Idiot!  Stupid is, as stupid does.  Black folks shoot themselves in the foot, face and head all day long and then turn around and wonder why they’re in the state that they’re in.

I suggest you print this article out and sit down at your desk and plan out your year:

• learn everything about real estate
• learn everything about accounting
• learn everything about taxes
• save $30,000 this year

Now that sounds like a financial new year’s resolution that you can achieve.

 Please visit my legal website: Las Vegas Nevada DUI Penalties
See me on YouTube: Seattle Cop Punches Black Teenage Girl

Chuck Berry Collapses On-Stage 3 Times (video)

Chuck Berry Collapses On-Stage

Chuck Berry, Black Rock-n-Roll Legend, 84 years old, was performing on-stage at the Concert Theater and Collapsed 3 times.  He had to be escorted off-stage and was seen by an attending physician.  Each time, however, instead of leaving he popped right back on-stage to continue performing.  The last time he announced that he was leaving, but not before doing his signature “scoot-step”.

The promoter of the event told the Chicago Tribune, “Obviously, something was off … Fifteen minutes into the set it went from fine to something wasn’t right. He was starting songs mid-song, playing 15 seconds of a song.”

As is his style, instead of proceeding to a hospital, the rock-n-roll legend simply got into a limousine and was taken to his mansion.

 Please visit my legal website: Las Vegas Nevada DUI Penalties
See me on YouTube: Seattle Cop Punches Black Teenage Girl

Michael Jackson’s Murderer Claims MJ Committed Suicide

Defense for Michael Jackson’s Doctor Claims MJ Committed Suicide

The Only Black International Mega-Star Michael Jackson

In a last ditch effort to obfuscate the truth, the lawyers for the doctor that murdered world pop icon, Michael Jackson, claim that the mega-entertainer killed himself within the space of a 120 second absence from his doctor.  The statement by Los Angeles County Deputy District Attorney David Walgren came at a hearing Wednesday where a lawyer for Dr. Conrad Murray clashed with the prosecutor over who should test residue from two syringes found in Jackson’s bedroom.  Walgren suggested the defense will claim Jackson killed himself by injecting more of the drug into himself. The case’s preliminary hearing begins January 4.

Dr. Conrad Murray’s defense plans to show that MJ was in a weakened state during previous the tours “Bad” and “Dangerous” and required a doctor to accompany him during the rehearsals and tours.  Apparently people say Jackson was frequently “dehydrated, medicated, and sleep-deprived.”

The defense’s argument is that MJ became very dependent on sleep inducing drugs at these times and since the final “This Is It” tour had dozens of dates added, Michael was under immense pressure and really afraid that he would fail and let his fans down.

The Murderer Dr. Conrad Murray

This is equivalent to the defense claiming that Michael Jackson committed suicide, either intentionally or accidentally.   If Doc Murray procured, prepared, and left available Propofol for Michael to take a fatal dose then Murray is as guilty as if he gave it to Michael himself.

The problem with this is that Propofol is not to be administered:

• outside of a controled environment by a hospital
• outside of the presence of an anesthesiologist present

The fact that the drug was administered outside a hospital or health-care facility is “mind-boggling,” says Dr. Kenneth Elmassian, a cardiac anesthesiologist at Michigan Regional Medical Center. “You can’t go to a pharmacist, hand a prescription over and get the drug,” he says. At the same time, he adds that any licensed physician can give the medication—though the American Society of Anesthesiologists (of which he is a board member), doesn’t recommend that doctors not trained in anesthesiology do so, because the drug is extremely dangerous.

The drug is just that deadly, IN THE EXACT WORDS OF THE MANUFACTURER. The fact that Doc Murray clearly allowed and supported Michael’s use of Propofol, by definition, makes the doctor a murderer.  They also claim that MJ was “addicted” to sleep medications, namely Propofol.  What is not being said is that the only way MJ could have “acquired” this addiction is via the good doctor, since only a doctor can acquire Propofol.

One in five academic anesthesiology training programs reported at least one case of abuse by physicians or other healthcare workers over the past decade, new research shows. The incidence of propofol abuse has risen fivefold over the last 10 years.

Propofol abuse shatters careers and lives—and worse. Only a few cc’s more than what’s required to put a person to sleep can trigger fatal respiratory arrest. That threat is an insufficient deterrent for determined users; 40% of residents who reportedly abused the anesthetic died from the high—the peril of propofol’s exquisitely narrow therapeutic window.

“That’s the drive to use this drug. It’s amazing,” said Paul Wischmeyer, MD, an anesthesiologist at the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center in Denver. “People who have abused propofol say it’s pretty much their first-choice drug every time.”

Because propofol is such a short-acting substance, heavy abusers must inject it frequently to stay high—as many as 50 to 100 times during a using session is not unheard of, he said. Access to the drug is not a problem, as propofol is among the most widely used anesthetic agents in both hospitals and, increasingly, office settings. “It’s everywhere,” Dr. Wischmeyer said. – by Adam Marcus

Notice 40% of Propofol abusers die from the drug, and we’re talking professionals who are killing themselves.

“Propofol is a medication that was invented 20 to 25 years ago for anesthesia. It’s what we call a sedative hypnotic. It puts you to sleep; it makes you forget things,” says Dr. David Kloth, past president of American Society of Interventionism Pain Physicians and current president of Connecticut Pain Society.

“It does not cause stage 4 REM sleep,” Kloth says. “Michael Jackson was unfortunately either misinformed or misunderstood … He would actually wake unrested, because the brain did not enter the appropriate stage of sleep.”

But from the same mouth comes a condemnation that puts aside all defenses of whether or not Michael Jackson administered himself a dose or not:

The consequences for the doctor who provided Jackson with the drug are dire. According to The Associated Press, Dr. Conrad Murray allegedly admitted to police that he set Jackson up with the IV, and Kloth thinks charges of manslaughter are not inappropriate if it turns out Jackson was improperly supervised while on profonol.


“You have given him the bullet, which he shot himself with,” Kloth says. “You gave him the loaded gun and said: pull the trigger.”  – by Newsweek

The doctor complains that he has to hire a bodyguard 24/7 and cannot practice medicine.  The pure simple fact that the defense would even pretend that MJ could administer himself a dose is ridiculous.  The fact is the doctor had him on an IV drip of Propofol.  The drug is super powerful and puts you out within 2 seconds.  Being on an IV drip would mean that there was no possibility that the King of Pop woke up and then administered himself another dose.

The doctor Conrad Murray is a murderer plain and simple.

Please visit my legal website: Las Vegas Nevada DUI Penalties
See me on YouTube: Seattle Cop Punches Black Teenage Girl