Colorado Shooting a CIA Operation: Video Proof

Colorado Shooting a CIA Operation: Video Proof

Watch this entire video, then go read about the Colorado shooting, and look at all the evidence. James Holmes, the Aurora, Colorado shooter who reportedly opened fire at a Batman movie premiere, was a medical student at the University of Colorado, pursuing a PhD in neuroscience, reports ABC News.

According to news reports, this sudden violent rampage was completely out of character for James Holmes, who was described as “shy.”

James Holmes Said He Thought to Dye his Hair

Billy Kromka, a pre-med student at the University of Colorado, Boulder, worked with Mr. Holmes for three months last summer as a research assistant in a lab of at the Anschutz Medical Campus. Mr. Kromka said he was surprised to learn Mr. Holmes was the shooting suspect. “It was just shocking, because there was no way I thought he could have the capacity to do commit an atrocity like this,” he said. “He spent much of his time immersed in the computer, often participating in role-playing online games…”

“After his arrest, Holmes told police about ‘possible explosives in his residence,’ Oates said. When police searched his apartment, they discovered it was booby-trapped and evacuated surrounding buildings, police said. Oates said bomb technicians are determining how to disarm flammable or explosive material in the third-floor apartment. He said police could be there some time.”

“He said pictures from inside the apartment are fairly disturbing and the devices look to be sophisticated, adding the booby-traps were ‘something I’ve never seen.’ One rifle, two handguns, a knife, a bullet proof vest, a ballistic helmet, a gas device, a gas mask, military SWAT clothing and unidentified explosives were also found in Holmes’ car, a law enforcement source told CBS News. Oates said Holmes wore a gas mask, a ballistic helmet and vest as well as leg, groin and throat protectors during the shooting.”

In other words, this guy was equipped with exotic gear by someone with connections to military equipment. SWAT clothing, explosives, complex booby-traps… c’mon, this isn’t a “lone gunman.” This is somebody who was selected for a mission, given equipment to carry it out, and then somehow brainwashed into getting it done.

Many Bomb and Shooting Experts Say Only Someone Highly Trained and Well Funded  Could Have Pulled this off

According to the N Y Times, Holmes apparently has no background. “He’s not on anybody’s radar screen — nothing,” said a peace officer in a NYT article. “This guy is somewhat of an enigma. Nobody knows anything about him.”

Mr. Holmes’s only criminal history is a traffic summons, the authorities said. He earned a bachelor’s degree with honors in neuroscience in 2010 from the University of California, Riverside, and was a graduate student in neurosciences at the University of Colorado at Denver’s Anschutz Medical Campus… He was currently collecting unemployment…

If you start to look at the really big picture here, the obvious question arises: How does an unemployed medical student afford all the complex weapons gear, bomb-making gear, “flammable” booby trap devices, ammunition, multiple magazines, bullet-proof vest, groin protection, ballistic helmet, SWAT uniform, and all the rest of it?

Think back to the “Hellraiser” movies and the one where the child opens the puzzle box. When the demon shows up, the child asks if he is coming to take him to hell and pinhead answers “it is not the hands that open the box, but the mind behind it.”

I believe the Colorado  shooter, IF HE EVEN WAS THE ONE DOING THE SHOOTING, was not the mind behind the shooting. Either he was coerced into a confession, because the shooter was dressed head to toe in riot gear, and no one could see his face, or he was hypnotized to carry out the shooting, which takes months, if not years of preparation by the hypnotist.

Watch the video and see.

So the question you have to ask yourself is: Does a medical student, who was on unemployment, with only a parking ticket on his record, who was shy, who enjoyed video games, who was a good student just suddenly buy $20,000 worth of equipment, set up intricate flaming military grade bombs, outfit himself head to toe in military grade riot gear, train himself to carry out a full invasion operation with gas, smoke and automatic weapons? Or is it more logical that they captured this poor shy med student, hypnotized him in a psycho medical laboratory experiment, trained him, funded all of his equipment, since he was on unemployment, setup sophisticated bombs for him, then finish him off to give himself up as the fall guy, so that whoever really did all this gets away scott free.

My money is on the 2nd explanation. Because of one simple fact. IF NOTHING ELSE IS TRUE, YOU CANNOT BUY $20,000 WORTH OF EQUIPMENT WHILE ON UNEMPLOYMENT. Any fool knows that. So where did he get the money? Where did he get the training? He was a med student, where did he get the time to learn all this?

Go back to that video and see that the hypnotist, in a matter of 10 seconds turned someone, who couldn’t shoot a gun, into a marksman. You do not have time to do much of anything, while in med school. But, if someone could grab you for 5 minutes every night for 6 months, and hypnotize you, they could turn you into an expert anything.

Please visit my legal website: Las Vegas DUI Lawyer
See me on YouTube: Seattle Cop Punches Black Teenage Girl

Was Osama Bin Ladin Killed on May 1, 2011?

Was Osama Bin Ladin Killed on May 1, 2011?

Have you never questioned several overlooked facts about the death of Osama bin Ladin?

1. Osama bin Laden, on the CIA website top 100 wanted persons, is not listed in connection with the world trade center bombing and has his denial of doing so on record, i.e. they believe he had nothing to do with it.

Completely Fake Osama Death Picture

2. on the CFR website they have Osama’s denial of bombing the world trade center on record, i.e. they also believe he had nothing to do with it

3. 7 of the hijackers allegedly in the world trade center bombings are ALIVE, 2 of which are suing the US government for defamation of character

4. Al Quaeda was formed by the CIA in afghanistan during the 90’s when they were fighting the Russians and the actual word means, THE LIST, i.e. of guys in the group

5. Osama bin Laden was asked to join the CIA in afghanistan AFTER the Al Quaeda group was formed, to serve as their inspirational speaker and help with financing, since he was so filthy rich

6. the Bin Laden family is a staunch friend of the US government

7. the Royal Family was HERE during 9/11 INCLUDING BIN LADEN

8. Bin Laden was here during and days after 9/11 for treatment for his kidneys

9. Pakistan’s First woman Prime Minister, Benazir Bhutto, was assassinated 4 years ago 2007, when she revealed in a world wide interview that Osama died in 2001

“Many believed that Benazir damaged the justification for the continued US presence in Afghanistan by saying to Sir David Frost on Al-Jazeera that Osama Bin Laden was dead, killed by Omar Saeed Sheikh, the former or current MI6 agent,”

10. On 2 November 2007, Bhutto participated in an interview with David Frost on Al Jazeera, stating Osama Bin Laden had been murdered by Ahmed Omar Saeed Sheikh, who is one of the men convicted of kidnapping and killing U.S. journalist Daniel Pearl. Frost never asked a follow up question regarding the claim that Bin Laden was dead.  Her interview could later be viewed on BBC’s website, although it was initially distorted by the BBC as her claim about Bin Laden’s death was taken out. But, once people discovered this and started posting evidence on YouTube, the BBC replaced its version with the version that was originally aired on Al Jazeera.

Completely Faked War Room Pic

11. Al-Qaeda commander Mustafa Abu al-Yazid claimed responsibility for the attack, describing Bhutto as “the most precious American asset.”  The Pakistani government also stated that it had proof that al-Qaeda was behind the assassination. A report for CNN stated: “the Interior Ministry also earlier told Pakistan’s Geo TV that the suicide bomber belonged to Lashkar i Jhangvi—an al-Qaeda-linked militant group that the government has blamed for hundreds of killings”.  The government of Pakistan claimed Baitullah Mehsud was the mastermind behind the assassination.  Lashkar i Jhangvi, a Wahabi Muslim extremist organization affiliated with al-Qaeda that also attempted in 1999 to assassinate former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, is alleged to have been responsible for the killing of the 54-year-old Bhutto along with approximately 20 bystanders, however this is vigorously disputed by the Bhutto family, by the PPP that Bhutto had headed and by Baitullah Mehsud.

12. even if Osama wasn’t killed by an MI6 agent, his kidney disease would have killed him within months following his 9/11 visit to a US hospital, especially since he was in fact, living in a cave, a fact that is documented by his very unhappy wife, who thought marrying a prince would mean endless shopping.

Any one of these facts clearly decimates any credibility the US government has for continuing these wars, the facts surrounding 9/11 and the reasons for our staying in these countries.  Also, if Benazir Bhutto can be believed, Osama was dead before even going to Afghanistan.  Even if you do not believe her, his kidney disease killed him before we went to war in Afghanistan.  That means not only were we lied to about Afghanistan, we were triply lied to about why we went to Iraq.

Let’s return to point #7.  Do you really think the Bin Laden royal family would tolerate the US government calling one of their sons all sorts of names and still remain close allies, if he were not already dead?  The US government is so deep in bed with this corruption it is cannot even be fathomed.

But people have really short memories.  Osama was ALREADY REPORTED DEAD IN 2001.

CIA Faked Countless Osama Videos After His Death


– Radio chatter from Bin Laden stopped
– Pakistan’s president, Pervez Musharraf, claimed that Bin Laden was dead and had been buried in the mountains
– Fox News report that Bin Laden died of a lung complication along with Pakistan
– The Bush administration claimed that a video released was probably hiding the fact he was dead
– The Afgan President claimed that Bin Laden was probably dead long ago

FOX News Report: Bin Laden Already Dead

Usama bin Laden has died a peaceful death due to an untreated lung complication, the Pakistan Observer reported, citing a Taliban leader who allegedly attended the funeral of the Al Qaeda leader.

[Fox News. December 26, 2001]

Bin Laden has often been reported to be in poor health. Some accounts claim that he is suffering from Hepatitis C, and can expect to live for only two more years. According to Le Figaro, last year [2000] he ordered a mobile dialysis machine to be delivered to his base at Kandahar in Afghanistan.


But by December, of course, that tape that was aired then, he’s barely moving the left side of his body. So he’s clearly got diabetes. He has low blood pressure. He’s got a wound in his foot. He’s apparently got dialysis … for kidney problems.


9/11 Families Want Pictures to Prove Osama Death

Renal dialysis — talking about hemodialysis — is something that really is reserved for patients in end-stage renal failure. That means their kidneys have just completely shut down. The most common cause of something like that would be something like diabetes and hypertension. Once that’s happened, if you’re separated from your dialysis machine — and incidentally, dialysis machines require electricity, they’re going to require clean water, they’re going to require a sterile setting — infection is a huge risk with that. If you don’t have all those things and a functioning dialysis machine, it’s unlikely that you’d survive beyond several days or a week at the most.


Usama bin Laden has died a peaceful death due to an untreated lung complication, the Pakistan Observer reported, citing a Taliban leader who allegedly attended the funeral of the Al Qaeda leader. “The Coalition troops are engaged in a mad search operation but they would never be able to fulfill their cherished goal of getting Usama alive or dead,” the source said.

[FOX News]

al-Wafd, Wednesday, December 26, 2001 Vol 15 No 4633

News of Bin Laden’s Death and Funeral 10 days ago

A prominent official in the Afghan Taleban movement announced yesterday the death of Osama bin Laden, the chief of al-Qa’da organization, stating that binLaden suffered serious complications in the lungs and died a natural and quiet death.

[Welfare State]

Israeli intelligence: Bin Laden is dead, heir has been chosen

Israeli sources said Israel and the United States assess that Bin Laden probably died in the U.S. military campaign in Afghanistan in December. They said the emergence of new messages by Bin Laden are probably fabrications, Middle East Newsline reported.

[World Tribune]

Please visit my legal website: Las Vegas DUI Lawyer
See me on YouTube: Seattle Cop Punches Black Teenage Girl

First Egypt Now Libya: Why Now?

Our Allies Hosni Mubarak and Muammar Gaddafi

Hmm paint me incredulous, but … wasn’t Hosni Mubarak and Muammar Gaddafi our ally just 2 seconds ago?  As a prime example Representative Thaddeus McCotter of Michigan, alegedly the represetative of the largest Arab American community in the united states, pretends the he and his constituants are against the Egyptian protesters.  Representative Thaddeus McCotter writes

Thus, America must stand with her ally Egypt to preserve an imperfect government capable of reform; and prevent a tyrranical government capable of harm.

For if Egypt is radicalized, all of the reforms sought by the Egyptian people and supported by the United States with them – including consensual and constitutional government; free elections; open and unbridled media; and Egyptian control of their natural resources – will be lost. Nascent democratic movements in the region will be co-opted and radicalized. The world’s free and open access to the Suez Canal’s vital commercial shipping lanes will be choked. And the Sinai Accord between Egypt and Israel – which must be protected as the foundation and principal example for Mideast peace – will be shredded…

This is not a nostalgic “anti-colonial uprising” from within, of all places, the land of Nassar. Right now, freedom’s radicalized enemies are subverting Egypt and other our allies.

What is not being said is that the sentiment against the Mubarak regime is not an American sentiment, but a Jewish sentiment.  Any casual search on the topic of Egypt will launch thousands of pages, documenting how horrible the Egyptian president is, but the sources of these alegations? Jewish periodicals.  U.S. foreign policy, on its face, has been for Egypt.  But… I have a smoking gun for you.  The U.S. started this revolution, not the Egyptian people.

America is playing both sides of the fence in this one.  We are duplicitous in our dealings with this country.

Pro – Egypt

  • The US has been giving Egypt $1 billion a year in military assistance. 
  • Egypt now has 1000 M1 Abrams Tanks, built in Egypt under license, and 
  • Egypt now has 2700+ older tanks of American and Soviet origin. 
  • The Egyptian Air Force has 216 F16s, plus hundreds of older planes. 
  • The Egyptian Air Defense command is pretty well stocked with second to latest generation US and Soviet missiles.

Con – Egypt

  • The American government secretly backed leading figures behind the Egyptian uprising who have been planning “regime change” for the past three years.
  • The American Embassy in Cairo helped a young dissident attend a US-sponsored summit for activists in New York
  • The American Embassy in Cairo helped keep his identity secret from Egyptian state police. 
  • The American Embassy in Cairo and the dissident secretly had drawn up a plan to overthrow President Hosni Mubarak and install a democratic government in 2011.

So I give you a clue here, who do you think funded the “uprising” in Egypt?  Who do you think funded the Egyptian government?  Who do you think supplied weapons for both sides?  Who do you think instigated the “protest” in Egypt?

A regime that wraps itself in the flag of truth fears truth most of all, for if its story is falsified in the slightest degree, its authority is gone. – Orson Scott Card

Shall I continue to enlighten you about what is REALLY going on?  I won’t even go into Iraq in this article.  Yes, Iraq was our ally and the atrocities that we then reported as an excuse to go to war with them have been documented, some out and out lies and some over simplifications of matters more complex than one simple writing could explain.  That is to say that Sadam Hussein throwing people in jail or “having them killed” was not just that simple to write it as a sentence.  But, the media loves to dumb down everything to get you to hate the guy.  But, they are in the business of selling news now, not reporting truth.  Noone would want to hear a clear explanation of the national policy of the Sadam Hussein regime, now would they?  No, so the powers that be made sure the news only reported that the man was a tyrant and a dictator, although we funded, trained and BROUGHT HIM TO POWER.

Now Libya

When I hear reports of a president turning machine guns on their own people, I always have a sinking feeling it has nothing to do with the president being a tyrant, as it does the IMF or the World Bank being behind it.

“So, as our new friend — our ally in the ‘war against terror’ — Gaddafi’s previous crimes against us were  forgotten. The IRA? Water under the bridge after the all-smothering Northern Ireland peace process. “

Weird how I’m like the only guy in America that doesn’t forget things when the news suddenly changes on a dime about people.  And also, color me incredulous but, how is it these sudden “enlightened students, just so happened to come and “take to the streets” at this very moment, via learning about their alleged “deplorable treatment by their leader” a la internet, when Libya has had internet access at the same time as the rest of the world, what for the past 20 years?

First Egypt, another ally, and now Libya.  Is it just pure coincidence that these people have erupted into civil wars?  Funny thing about civil wars, you really shouldn’t get involved, or it looks like an invasion.  But, I’m here to tell you that these “civil” wars, are not very civil at all, and are in fact, instigated by the CIA.

Please visit my legal website: Nevada DUI Attorneys
See me on YouTube: Seattle Cop Punches Black Teenage Girl

Jeremiah Wright: We Killed Innocent People in Iraq

Iraq Veterans Against the War

It has really come full circle. The chickens have come home to roost. I’m not talking about the CIA term “blowback”, where actions our secret service does to other countries comes back to haunt us. I am talking about our very open and direct actions which are crimes against humanity. Have you noticed that since 9/11 that there aren’t so many reports about the “war” in Iraq? Why? Because, the latest news is rather ugly. The reports of what really is going on in Iraq have come home and they aren’t pretty. Take for instance the reports about Fallujah. It was in Fallujah that the U.S. armed forced committed a massacre of over a million civilians. One my protest that the armed forces had no idea they were innocent civilians, but it was shown they did know. In fact it was shown that during the massacre it became customary to trick civilians to come out of their homes and then slaughter them in the street. It became customary to storm a house, drag the citizens out, and humiliate the father in front of the family. A practice known to scar the entire family for life, since they treat each other with the highest respect over there.

Blowback is the espionage term for the violent, unintended consequences of a covert operation that are suffered by the civil population of the aggressor government. To the civilians suffering it, the blowback typically manifests itself as “random” acts of political violence without a discernible, direct cause; because the public—in whose name the intelligence agency acted—are ignorant of the effected secret attacks that provoked revenge (counter-attack) against them.

Not only did reports come in, but documentaries of the wholesale slaughter of innocent civilians have been made. Some are quite popular as well, selling millions of copies. These documentaries showed armed forces using incendiary bombs on civilians homes; beating, maiming and slaughtering children; raping female children; and burning and collapsing huge apartment buildings known to have thousands of people inside. These documentaries show armed forces using new Napalm, which burns the flesh off of live people. They show chemical warfare use. And, it all comes back to “against innocent civilians.”

I heard some incredible number, in the millions, being quoted about the number of Iraqis who have died at the hands of the U.S. in this “war.” Notice I keep saying “war.” But, the fact is, Iraq has not been “declared” to be a war by Congress, as prescribed in our Constitution.

In the United States, Congress which makes the rules for the military has the power under the Constitution to “declare War,” however there is no prescribed legal format for what a War declaration will look like in the US Constitution or by law. Declarations have the force of law and are intended to be executed by a Commander in Chief when called into actual service. The last time United States passed a bill with the title “Declaration of War” was in 1942, against Romania. Since then, the United States has used the term “Authorization to use Military Force” as in the case against Iraq in 2003. Many times, such as the US Invasion of Haiti in 1993, decisions for military engagements were made by US presidents, without formal approval by Congress, based on UN Security Council resolutions that did not declare UN or its members at war. This has been seen also as a subterfuge to allow the United States to dispense with the international laws of war, for example by declaring hostages as criminals rather than as prisoners of war.

So we see that Iraq is not a war at all. So what really is going on in Iraq? Well, it seems to be a lot of unnecessary slaughter going on over there. Unnecessary, for one simple fact: Iraq has never posed a threat to the U.S.. Iraq was, in fact, our ally all the way up to the day we invaded. Even after the Kuwait ordeal we were still on friendly terms with Iraq. In fact, we put Saddam Hussein in power. We did that.

It is My Duty to Speak Out

You may try and construct a chain of command and make an organization where one does not and cannot think for one’s self. However, as humans, invariably there will be a few humans who will be slightly less a moron than the other people you have recruited and figure out that what they are being told to do is: against their own beliefs; against God; against humanity.

It is one thing to be ordered to go shoot at people that are shooting at you. It is another thing to be ordered to shoot soccer moms; drop huge, gargantuan bombs on city centers filled with milkmen, candlestick makers, maids, candy salesmen, shoe repairmen. It is one thing to give the order and then to have the wife of the candlestick maker crying inconsolably over her husband asking why this is happening. It is one thing to give the order and then see children crawling on the ground with a leg and arm blown off screaming for their mother. It is one thing to give the order and then hear a baby crying only to be silenced by a gunshot to the head followed by a sick wet sound of its blood running down the crib.

This is not what America wants. This is not what the world wants. If George Bush were to do this to us inside the United States, U.N. forces would have arrested him and congress and the top military brass and tried them for war crimes and genocide. Right now though the U.N. is mired in red tape over this “war” that isn’t a “war”.

Jeremiah Wright Thrown Under the Bus

It was a fact that Jeremiah Wright, minister of President Obama’s former church was thrown under the bus for political expediency. All the stations looped Reverend Wright saying something ghastly over and over and over.

Fox News and others kept showing a sound bite of Jeremiah Wright saying “America’s Chickens are Coming Home to Roost”. That is the only sound bite they showed of the sermon. But in actuality Reverend Wright was quoting U.S. Ambassador Edward Peck, a retired, “white”, career U.S. diplomat who served 32-years in the U.S. Foreign Service and was chief of the U.S. mission to Iraq under Jimmy Carter — hardly the black-rage image with which Wright has been stigmatized.

Obama instead of explaining that Jeremiah Wright was quoting a U.S. ambassador and that what both learned men were saying was correct, instead took the low road to save his political campaign. Reverend Wright was then left with the reputation of being some Black objectionary, militant, racist, when in fact he was and is the opposite.

Now we come to the real story. We come to the story that cannot be denied any longer. We cannot deny it, because the story is now coming from our very troops. The U.S. is slaughtering people in Iraq for no good reason. More and more veterans of the war are speaking out and sounding the same bell that the learned Reverend Jeremiah Wright [also a former Marine] sounded in his now infamous sermon.

Iraq Veterans Against the War is a group of veterans who have organized to speak out against this horrible war. They have organized together so that no one could quiet them individually and so that Americans can really know what our military ambassadors are doing in our good name. It is a shame they had to organize in such a way, but this is the reality of the situation. If they speak out individually, they won’t be heard; they get life threats; they get black balled out of various things; they get denied things owed to them.

No longer can we just sit at the dinner table and laugh at Reverend Jeremiah Wright, AND by proxy Ambassador Edward Peck, but now we have to pay attention because our sons and daughters are coming home saying how much truth both men were telling.

The obvious question is: Does Obama know? Actually most of these atrocities did not happen on his watch. However, they are still going on, so yes he must know. He needs to bring the troops home immediately.

I know why they are over there. While, politically it’s quite a grey area, the execution of it, has and is horrible. I say grey area, because had I been in Bush’s shoes I may have wanted to remove Sadam myself. But, that’s the bully way of doing things, isn’t it? I have a brain and would have found some other way to get Saddam to agree with me. So the entire war was and is unnecessary.

You might ask what is it I know about the war? It is quite simple once you hear it.

My dates might be off by some months, but the facts are very similar. The current world currency is the U.S. dollar (USD), right? Everyone knows that. One of the chief and most important things that is traded in the USD is oil. Well in mid 2,000 Saddam Hussein, bless his heart, declared that Iraq would now move his oil exports to the Euro. He completely removed the USD from his countries oil exports entirely. It was a brilliant move and would shore up Iraqs wealth immensely since the dollar was and is a completely fiat currency that is nearly worthless. Bush and friends were sitting on their thumbs wondering what to do to get Saddam back into trading oil with dollars. If they didn’t do something soon, the entire middle east would follow the lead of Saddam.

This is what is known as “Petrodollar Warfare.”

Well what does that mean? It means we would have to pay the real price of oil finally. And more than likely either our economy would collapse over night or we would go back to producing stuff that the entire world wants to buy. Instead of going that route, Bush declared Iraq had weapons of mass destruction, which Hanz Blick squarely said he didn’t, MONTHS before, even wrote a book about it, and invaded Iraq. Within days of the invasion, they removed the government of Iraq, set another one in its place, and repealed the declaration to trade oil in Euros instead of dollars.

That’s what this war is about. Not oil, not greed, not any other weird or sinister thing. The rest of the middle east is kind of on the fence about this whole Iraq thing. On the one hand they realy did not like Saddam, remember we put him in power. On the other hand, what he was doing was interesting by leaving the dollar trade in oil.

So Why are We Still in Iraq?

That my frend is the billion dollar question. And, I’m going to give you the answer, and it is not going to make any damn sense to you.

The reason we are still in Iraq is because American companies are making too much damn money to leave.

That’s right. This is now, not about security, nor terrorism, nor pride, nor democracy. This is about huge, super huge companies, that are in control of the government that is bleeding us and Iraq dry. They have got their teeth firmly latched onto our necks and are not going to let go. They literally make a million dollars each month washing the clothes of the military over there. In fact, they made it a punishable rule that servicemen cannot wash their own clothes. They are drinking every last drop of blood we have and our politicians are letting them.


I wonder when they were briefing Obama, after he won, about these companies and the war, what his reaction was. I wonder if the was shocked, amazed or disgusted. Can you imagine win the seat to the most powerful position in the world and then being told that basically you have no power and that those days of the president issuing decrees and fighting congress are long gone. But, the show lingers on.

Let me leave you with this quote:

“the greatest purveyor of violence in the world today — my own government,” and that “America was founded on genocide, and a nation that is founded on genocide is destructive.” – Dr. Martin Luther King

Please visit my legal website: Las Vegas DUI Attorney
See me on YouTube: Shakaama Live

Terrorism: It’s All a Lie

Islam is it Really Evil? Are there Really Boogie Men?

I’ve been researching, watching documentaries, reading up on our little angelic republic and Islam and Osama Bin Laden, and Mr Saddam Hussein.

I’m gonna mess up this quote I’m sure, “news of my death has been greatly exaggerated”.

It seems in both cases we not only trained, sold them weapons, made contracts with them, but out and out lied about how bad they were 0.o

It is staggering how awful and HUGE the lies are about these two men.

Oh Oh, and then I found out “terrorism” INCLUDING 9/11 is responsible for a whopping 5,000 American deaths, ever. FIVE THOUSANDS DEATHS! THAT’S A 5 WITH 3 ZEROS. That’s it? Wait what?

[ pictured left, real Osama 2001 left, fake Osama 2006 right ] Dude seriously. Honestly. Tell me. What in God’s HOLY name is going on? five thousand people. More soldiers have died in Iraq than all the Americans combined have died due to terrorism. 150,000 people die every year from heart disease alone.

When I found out about Osama not being the leader of a terrorist sleeper cell… WAIT when I found out that “AL QUA EDA” is a made up CIA word meaning LITERALLY – “the list” of the Afghanistan freedom fighters. There is no “group” called Al Qua Eda. Then when you go to the CIA website, of the most wanted list, Bin Laden is not wanted in connection withe 9/11, at all. In fact there is no mention of 9/11. Not only that, the CFR, has the full confession by Bin Laden himself saying he not only did not do 9/11, but knew nothing about it. From the information I’ve looked over from the CIA, the CFR and other actual credible and direct sources, Osama Bin Laden and the Bin Laden Saudi family are welcomed friends by the U.S. government. Man I tell you, I wanted to burn my bra… err… underwear. [declassified materials]

“Al-Qaida,(sic) literally ‘the database,’ was originally the computer file of the thousands of mujahideen who were recruited and trained with help from the CIA to defeat the Russians,” admits former British Foreign Secretary Robin Cook, whose Foreign Office portfolio included control of British Intelligence Agency MI-6 and the Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ), in a column published by the UK Guardian newspaper.

In other words, the so-called Al Qaeda, which has been promoted by the Media Cartel as the cause of all bombings and terrorism since the destruction of the World Trade Center in New York on September 11, 2001, is simply a database of CIA trained “terrorists” (or “freedom fighters,” depending on your perspective) which has become a convenient Global Boogeyman for the 21st Century.

Overall, the U.S. government looked favorably on the Arab recruitment drives. … Some of the most ardent cold warriors at [CIA headquarters at] Langley thought this program should be formally endorsed and extended. … [T]he CIA “examined ways to increase their participation, perhaps in the form of some sort of international brigade,” … Robert Gates [then-head of the CIA’s Directorate of Intelligence] recalled. … At the Islamabad station Milt Bearden felt that bin Laden himself “actually did some very good things” … But nothing came of it …

But J. Michael Springmann, head of the non-immigrant visa section at the “CIA-dominated” US consulate in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, in 1987-88, said he learned that the CIA had a “program to bring people to the United States for terrorist training, people recruited by the CIA and its asset Usama bin Laden, and the idea was to get them trained and send them back to Afghanistan to fight the then Soviets.” “Their nationalities for the most part were Pakistani, Palestinian, Syrian, Lebanese.” These “recruits without backgrounds” were given visas over Springmann’s protests.

WAIT, then I found out that all the 9/11 hijackers are all alive, yes all 19 are alive and well. [ correction 18 are alive, one was already dead before 2001 ] In fact one was issued an apology by our own government.

However as soon as the list of “hijackers” was published, doubts began to arise. Saudi Arabia’s Foreign Minister Prince Saud Al-Faisal told the Arabic Press after meeting with President George W. Bush on Sept. 20th, “It was proved that five of the names included in the FBI list had nothing to do with what happened.” 1. Saeed Alghamdi, 2. Mohand Alshehri, 3. Abdul aziz Alomari, 4. Salem Alhazmi

Saudi officials at the embassy were unable to verify the whereabouts of the fifth accused hijacker, 5. Khalid Al-Mihdhar. However, Arab newspapers say Al-Mihdhar is still alive.

A sixth person on the FBI’s list, Saudi national 6. Waleed Alshehri, is living in Casablanca, according to an official with the Royal Air Moroc, the Moroccan commercial airline. According to the unnamed official, Alshehri lived in Dayton Beach, Fla., where he took flight training at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University. Now he works for a Moroccan airline. On Sept. 22, Associated Press reported that Alshehri had spoken to the U.S. embassy in Morocco. “His photograph was released by the FBI, and has been shown in newspapers and on television around the world. That same Mr Al-Shehri has turned up in Morocco, proving clearly that he was not a member of the suicide attack. ” – Daily Trust 24th September 2001 “He was reported to have been in Hollywood, Florida, for a month earlier this year but his father, Ahmed, said that Waleed was alive and well and living in Morocco.”

2 men with same name cobbled together into terrorist

Omari Number 1
7. Mr. Al-Omari, a pilot with Saudi Airlines, walked into the US embassy in Jeddah to demand why he was being reported as a dead hijacker in the American media.

“a pilot with Saudi Airlines, was astonished to find himself accused of hijacking ­ as well as being dead ­ and has visited the US consulate in Jeddah to demand an explanation.” – Independent 17th September 2001

Omari Number 2
8. ” a Saudi man has reported to authorities that he is the real Abdulaziz Alomari, and claims his passport was stolen in 1995 while he studied electrical engineering at the University of Denver. Alomari says he informed police of the theft.” – ABCNews “I couldn’t believe it when the FBI put me on their list. They gave my name and my date of birth, but I am not a suicide bomber. I am here. I am alive. I have no idea how to fly a plane. I had nothing to do with this.” – Telegraph 23rd September 2001 “Alomari has since been found in Saudi Arabia and is apparently cleared in the case” – New York Times

9. Mr. Al-Ghamdi is still alive and well and at his job for Tunis Air “I was completely shocked. For the past 10 months I have been based in Tunis with 22 other pilots learning to fly an Airbus 320. The FBI provided no evidence of my presumed involvement in the attacks.” – Telegraph 23rd September 2001 “..not dead and had nothing to do with the heinous terror attacks in New York and Washington.” – Saudi embassy

10. “Mr Al-Hamzi is 26 and had just returned to work at a petrochemical complex in the industrial eastern city of Yanbou after a holiday in Saudi Arabia when the hijackers struck. He was accused of hijacking the American Airlines Flight 77 that hit the Pentagon.” – Telegraph 23rd September 2001

11. Ahmed Alnami (Flight 93) “I’m still alive, as you can see. I was shocked to see my name mentioned by the American Justice Department. I had never even heard of Pennsylvania where the plane I was supposed to have hijacked.” He had never lost his passport and found it “very worrying” that his identity appeared to have been “stolen” and published by the FBI without any checks. The FBI had said his “possible residence” was Delray Beach in Florida. ” – Telegraph 23rd September 2001

12. Ameer Bukhari “Ameer Bukhari died in a small plane crash last year. ” – CNN Correction [ that would have been he died in 2000. Poor guy, may he rest in peace. And hopefully the FBI will apologize for smearing a dead man’s name. ]

13. Adnan Bukhari “Adnan Bukhari is still in Florida” – CNN Correction

14. Amer Kamfar “..that a suspect sought by the FBI, Amer Kamfar, was in fact an alive pilot in Arabia. ” – Wal Fadjri 21st September 2001 [translate]

15. “Saudi Embassy officials in Washington have challenged his identity. They say a Saudi electrical engineer named Abdulaziz Alomari had his passport and other papers stolen in 1996 in Denver when he was a student and reported the theft to police there at the time. ” – BBC

The others are missing or no one knows who the FBI meant by those names. Nearly every one of the men named have all been cleared. Quite a few of them actually work in the U.S. military. Isn’t that strange? The Saudi Airlines pilot, along with the airlines considered suing the FBI for defamation of character, of both the pilot and the airline. Needless to say, the FBI blew it off. But still has all 19 on their website.

Robert Mueller, Director of the FBI, has twice been forced to admit on CNN that there is “no legal proof to prove the identities of the suicidal hijackers”. identities of the hijackers LATimes The Director of the FBI FBI MUELLER identify hijacker said on September 20 in response to the question: Do you still have a high level of confidence that you can accurately identify the hijackers?

MR. MUELLER: I know I said at the outset that I had a high level of confidence on the identities of the hijackers. We have several hijackers whose identities were those of the names on the manifests. We have several others that are still in question. So it’s … the investigation is ongoing, and I am not certain as to several of the others.

WAIT, when I found out that we tried to force Saddam Hussein to accept World Bank loans and he refused; threatened him, and he refused; cause an uprising, and the people refused; … send in assassin squads, who failed; …. Man, I tell you, this country of ours.

What is going on?

Please visit my legal website: Las Vegas DUI Attorney
See me on YouTube: Shakaama Live

Who’s Behind the Energy Crisis: The Real Story

There is No Energy Crisis

We’ve been told for over 40 years now that there is an energy crisis. From the start of the 70’s up to today you’ve been had. You’ve been took. You’ve been hoodwinked, bamboozled, led astray, run amok. How could it be that the most powerful country on the planet, that has its own oil fields, several hundred thousand capped mind you, is at the mercy of others to provide the essential oil we so desperately need?

The simple fact is: we are not at the mercy of foreign powers. The simple fact is: we do not need anyone else’s oil. For some of you this revelation is hard to swallow. In your mind, you know all the issues. In your mind you know all the players. In your mind you know all the motives. I mean, they’re out to make money and sell oil right? So you reason to yourself. Surely there could not be some ulterior, sinister motive other than to sell oil.

Let’s return to the 70’s for a brief history look. Who was the “enemy” at that time? The… communist Russians, right? Yes, that’s correct. We were told that the Russians were desperately out to get us. Oh and the Russians would bomb us and wipe us out at any opportunity that they possibly could. Let’s back up only 20 years earlier. Who were the Russians then? Why, they were our staunchest allies. In fact, without them and us, together arm in arm, the world would be a very very different place. We defeated Hitler scant years earlier. So what difference does 20 no sorry, 10 years make, because they were allegedly our enemies in the 60’s actually.

The Russians did not change. They did not change at all. In fact, quite a few presidents went over to visit the Russians. You don’t have, as a foreign policy protocol, the highest office visit a known enemy and an identified threat to our national security. So, could it be that these Russians were not our enemies at all? Yes. We were being brainwashed. And, when the damn broke Washington was caught with its pants down. Suddenly Reagan was being repainted as a hero, instead of leading the charge against our enemy the Russians. The fact was, that Russia was crumbling some 20 years before Reagan even took office.

Who was the next enemy? Terrorists! We started getting reports about terrorist plots and terrorist threats. One simple fact escaped the America public however, there had never been, and never will a terrorist attack on U.S. soil. If you can read, you realize what I just wrote. If you don’t believe it, go look it up in the F.B.I. files, and the C.I.A. files. There has never been a terrorist attack on U.S. soil, and no terrorist is wanted for questioning for any attack on U.S. soil. Even Ben Laden is not wanted for any attack on U.S. soil. So obviously this terrorist scheme as an enemy is winding down and wearing thin. So we have already moved on to the next “enemy”.

That next enemy is already here. Rogue States! That is to say, those countries, yes plural, that pose a threat to U.S. security. This one is harder than the terrorist scheme to sell to the American public, because we really can’t see the evidence of these “rogue states”. There are no other countries, other than Columbia and its drugs, that directly impacts the U.S. to any degree of direct threat or certainty. Bush tried his best with his “axis of evil” speech to deliver the message of “rogue states.” But, he was a bumbling fool, no offense intended. He was oratorically challenged and could not sell ice water to an African Bushman in the Gobi Desert. We have yet to see if Obama is going to continue the charade.

Well what does all this have to do with oil and there not being an energy crisis? Simple. What if I told you this plot to have an “enemy” was concocted 40 years ago. And, that each “enemy” was listed back then. I have it on great authority that this is the case. [sources include state department officials, cabinet members, U.S. military generals, former astronauts, former information community agents] The final enemy I will not speak of due to how strange it sounds. [bookmark this page and return to it in about 5 years and you’ll realize how truthful this article is] I would prefer not to be harassed nor made the scape goat of a community I am not a part of. [the intelligence community]

With this scheme of directing our attention to an “enemy” at all times, the real plan was also hatched. A few key players would call the shots in the U.S., and actually the world, for all the energy resources.

What would happen if it were found out that there exist an energy resource and has been around for 40 years, that would make the combustion engine, as we know it, obsolete. How upset would you be, to find out that the thousands of dollars you have spent at the gas station personally, could have all been avoided. I have watched interviews with Arabian princes, and Sheiks who have hinted at it. One even said:

“there is no reason oil should be thrown away on a car to begin with.”

Why would a member of OPEC say that? Is there something he knows that we do not? Could he be hinting at a technology that existed already that would make use of gasoline for an engine to be unnecessary? Another member was interviewed and said:

“I don’t like to sell gasoline to Americans. I would prefer they not use gas at all, they are just throwing it away. I would prefer they use it for something else.”

Clearly these two are on to something. They were hinting at something that the rest of us are in the dark about. What other use, than gasoline for a car, could oil be used for? Or, let me put that question another way. If not gasoline, what other energy source could we use to replace oil, and use oil for common products instead, which do not waste nearly 1/10th as much oil as gasoline does? These two statements are more confirmation about an alternative resource being out there, other than oil.

So, why the charade? Money of course. And, it’s going to get worse. As oil gets more and more scarce, OPEC and other “rogue states” which have oil, are going to tighten up and sell less and less oil, so as to preserve their holdings. You can expect sharp spikes in the price of oil in as quickly as a year. And, when I say a sharp spike in oil prices, I mean the current highs will not compare to the drastic price increases in the near future.

Occasionally the president has gone over the OPEC to slap them around and keep them calm. But, the president can’t keep a hold on the lid, when oil reserves are decreasing. It is a reality and no amount of evil schemes are 40 year old plans can stop it. If Obama is a good old boy, he’ll be going over there to slap them around and get them to keep playing along with the farce as well. However, I wouldn’t hold my breath. If the wells are running dry, no amount of slapping around can help the situation.

I don’t think the Saudis will spill the beans publicly, but I do expect they will tighten their belts and ignore anything this president or any other president from foreign countries have to say. Remember this is a global issue.

The foreign governments, that are in the “know”, are keeping quiet, which includes the OPEC countries. However, the OPEC countries have a duty to their own nations first. While they might not spill the beans, since they are getting rich off the scheme, they will have to lessen oil exports if not stop them completely.

Have you ever wondered why we cap our own wells and import foreign oil? And, it’s not a matter of lack of oil refineries here, nor prohibitive costs of opening the wells, nor the prohibitive cost of drilling new sites. The reason is, this scheme is so good, they don’t have to drill another drop here. They are making money hand over fist off of the ignorance of the common American citizen, and citizens around the world really.

If you trade, I recommend you get into oil and hold, find a good entry point now, and buy buy buy.

For those interested in more research on the subject, look up: NRO National Reconaissance Organization; ACIO; SDI strategic defense initiative; Sibel Edmonds.

[nothing here should be construed as broker advice]

Please visit my legal website: Las Vegas DUI Attorney
See me on YouTube: Shakaama Live